Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sepulvado, 367 So. 2d 762.

1912 citing documents.

State v. Washington 406 So. 2d 191 La. 1981
State v. Smith 407 So. 2d 652 La. 1981
State v. Rogers 405 So. 2d 829 La. 1981
State v. Campbell 404 So. 2d 1205 La. 1981
State v. Telsee 404 So. 2d 921 La. 1981
State v. Prados 404 So. 2d 925 La. 1981
State v. Acliese 403 So. 2d 665 La. 1981
State v. Smith 404 So. 2d 210 La. 1981
State v. McDonald 404 So. 2d 889 La. 1981
State v. Tilley 400 So. 2d 1363 La. 1981
Accordingly, this Court held that a sentence, although within the statutory limit, might violate a defendant's constitutional right against excessive punishment.
State v. Martin 400 So. 2d 1063 La. 1981
State v. Daranda 398 So. 2d 1053 La. 1981
State v. Davenport 399 So. 2d 201 La. 1981
State v. Guiden 399 So. 2d 194 La. 1981
State v. Williams 397 So. 2d 1287 La. 1981
Art. 1, § 20; Art. 5, § 5(C)
State v. Reed 396 So. 2d 1316 La. 1981
State v. Forshee 395 So. 2d 742 La. 1981
State v. Thomas 395 So. 2d 802 La. 1981
Defendant alleges that the sentence is excessive under Article 1, Section 20 of the Constitution of 1974, (La.
State v. Saunders 393 So. 2d 1278 La. 1981
State v. Bretz 394 So. 2d 245 La. 1981
State v. Fields 394 So. 2d 597 La. 1981
State v. Molinet 393 So. 2d 721 La. 1981
State v. Lawson 393 So. 2d 1260 La. 1981
State v. Clark 391 So. 2d 1174 La. 1980
State v. Day 391 So. 2d 1147 La. 1980
State v. LaFleur 391 So. 2d 445 La. 1980
State v. Brumfield 390 So. 2d 1335 La. 1980
We are unable to review defendant’s claim of excessiveness, because the trial judge did not state for the record the considerations taken into account in imposing sentence, as required by La.
State v. Beatty 391 So. 2d 828 La. 1980
State v. Franks 391 So. 2d 1133 La. 1980
State v. MacDonald 390 So. 2d 1276 La. 1980
State v. Ramos 390 So. 2d 1262 La. 1980
State v. Bourgeois 388 So. 2d 359 La. 1980
we stated that the statutory criteria legislatively provided by La.Code Crim.P.
State v. Daranda 388 So. 2d 759 La. 1980
State v. Jones 386 So. 2d 85 La. 1980
Dove v. Dove 386 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
State v. Dye 384 So. 2d 420 La. 1980
State v. Bonanno 384 So. 2d 355 La. 1980
(La.1979), we held that a sentence may violate a defendant's constitutional right against excessive punishment even though that sentence is within the statutory limit, and that this Court could review a defendant's sentence *357 for excessiveness on appeal.
State, in Interest of Brown 385 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
State v. Jacobs 383 So. 2d 342 La. 1980
State v. Ortego 382 So. 2d 921 La. 1980
State v. Jones 381 So. 2d 416 La. 1980
State v. Roussel 381 So. 2d 796 La. 1980
State v. Grider 380 So. 2d 611 La. 1980
State v. Gordy 380 So. 2d 1347 La. 1980
State v. Richardson 377 So. 2d 1029 La. 1979
State v. Voelkel 377 So. 2d 1204 La. 1979
State v. Stegall 377 So. 2d 103 La. 1979
State v. Little 377 So. 2d 332 La. 1979
State v. Blackwell 377 So. 2d 110 La. 1979
The sentence of ten years was therefore within the statutory limit; such a sentence may violate a defendant's right against excessive punishment under Article 1, § 20 of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974, and is therefore reviewable by this court.
State v. Bell 377 So. 2d 275 La. 1979