DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Tullier v. Tanson Enterprises, Inc., 367 So. 2d 773.

20 citing documents.

  • Nora Richard v. Akeem Khalif La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    Tullier v. Tanson Enter’s Inc.
  • Richard v. Khalif 185 So. 3d 259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Tullier v. Tanson Enter’s Inc.
  • D'Aubin v. Pop's Rv Outlet, Inc. 138 So. 3d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    1st Cir.1978), rev’d on other grounds
  • Tolar v. Spillers 2 So. 3d 560 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Both of these articles turn on the purpose or intended use for which the lease was granted, and in this case, the language which must be considered for the determination of the lease purpose defines the lease “for hunting, fishing and other outdoor recreational activity.” In Tullier v. Tanson Enterprises, Inc., our Supreme Court said: |fiThe lease itself may expressly provide the purpose for which the premises are leased and for restrictions on the use of the leased premises.
  • Good v. Saia 967 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    1 Cir.1978), writ granted and rev'd on other grounds
  • Martin Timber Co. v. Pegues 715 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    1st Cir.1978), reversed on other grounds
  • Carriere v. Bank of Louisiana 702 So. 2d 648 La. 1997
    App. 1st Cir.1978) reversed on other grounds
  • Ergon, Inc. v. Allen 593 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    1st Cir.1978), reversed on other grounds
  • Lemke v. Amidon 542 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    Tullier v. Tanson Enterprises, Inc., Bailey v. Franks Petroleum, Inc., supra; (La.App.
  • Quality Manufacturing Co. v. Direct Factory Stores, Inc. 540 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    2) To pay the rent at the terms agreed on.” “In his occupancy of the property the tenant is obligated not to use the premises for a purpose inconsistent with that contemplated by the parties at the time they confected the lease.” Tullier v. Tanson Enterprises, Inc.
  • KPW ASSOCIATES v. SS Kresge Co. 535 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    1st Cir.1978), reversed on other grounds
  • URS RENTAL SERVICES CO. v. Dongieux 480 So. 2d 1034 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    Tullier v. Tanson Enterprise, Inc.
  • Bailey v. Franks Petroleum, Inc. 479 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Tullier v. Tanson Enterprises, Inc., (La.
  • Huard's, Inc. v. Southern States Management Corp. 450 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Tullier v. Tanson Enterprises, Inc.
  • Bunch v. Heck 440 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    1st Cir.1938); see also Tullier v. Tanson Enterprises, Inc.
  • Franzone v. Merchants Trust & Savings Bank 437 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Tullier v. Tanson Enterprises, Inc, Wilson v. Cost + Plus of Vivian, Inc.
  • System Fuels, Inc. v. International Tank Terminals, Ltd. 435 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    2d Cir.1979), Tullier v. Tanson Enterprises, Inc.
  • Exxon Corp. v. Robichaux 393 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    Tullier v. Tanson Enterprises, Inc.
  • Kizer v. Burk 439 So. 2d 1051 La. 1980
    Tullier v. Tanson Enterprises, Inc., (La.
  • Wilson v. Cost+ Plus of Vivian, Inc. 375 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
    Tullier v. Tanson Enterprises, Inc., Mancuso v. Sigmor Distributing Serv.