Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Haughton Elevator Division v. STATE, ETC., 367 So. 2d 1161.
- Starlight Homes v. Jefferson Parish Coun. 632 So. 2d 3 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
- Porter v. Hobbs 627 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
-
Stafford Const. Co., Inc. v. Terrebonne Parish School Bd.
612 So. 2d 847
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
In Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Division of Administration, the Louisiana Supreme Court declared that "a low bidder may ...
- Louisiana Associated Gen. Contr. v. Calcasieu 586 So. 2d 1354 La. 1991
-
Abadie v. Bolton
581 So. 2d 657
La. 1991
See Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co., Equitable Petroleum v. Central Transmission, Inc., (La.App.
-
TRIAD RES. & SYSTEMS v. Parish of Lafourche
577 So. 2d 86
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Division of Administration
- FH MYERS CONST. v. City of New Orleans 570 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
-
Airline Const. v. Ascension Parish School Board
568 So. 2d 1029
La. 1990
Boxwell v. Department of Highways, 203 La.
-
Thigpen Const. Co. v. Parish of Jefferson
560 So. 2d 947
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
As our Supreme Court found in Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Etc., : The statute, insofar as it requires advertising and the obtaining of competitive bids, is a prohibitory law founded on public policy.
- Roe v. State, Division of Administration 560 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- Paillot v. Wooton 559 So. 2d 758 La. 1990
-
South Cent. Bell Telephone Co. v. PSC
555 So. 2d 1370
La. 1990
Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co., J. Friedenthal, M. Kane & A. Miller, Civil Procedure § 15.4 at 702 (1985).
-
State in Matter of Adoption of SRP
555 So. 2d 612
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
2701, 2705 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972)
- Dotd v. Standard Const. Co. of Ga. 550 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
Airline Construction Co. v. Ascension Parish School Board
549 So. 2d 1240
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Additionally, we are convinced that Act 795 of 1979 was enacted partially in response to Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Division of Administration
-
Jo Ellen Smith Psychiatric Hospital v. Harrell
546 So. 2d 886
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Haughton Elevator Division v. State, through the Division of Administration, Federal National Mortgage Association v. O’Donnell, supra.
-
State ex rel. Anderson
550 So. 2d 192
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Haughton Elevator Div. v. State, Through Division of Administration
-
Jensen Const. Co. v. DEPT. OF TRANSP. OF DEV.
542 So. 2d 168
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Division of Administration
- HTW Transp. Co. v. New Orleans Aviation Bd. 527 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
-
Davis v. Natchitoches Parish School Board
525 So. 2d 624
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Haughton Elevator Division v. State, through Division of Administration, Budd Construction, 401 So.2d at 1076 .
-
DM Clement Contr. v. ST. CHALES PARISH
524 So. 2d 86
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
38:2212 J. Haughton Elevator Division v. State, etc.
-
Donald M. Clement Contractor, Inc. v. St. Charles Parish
524 So. 2d 86
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
38:2212 J. Haughton Elevator Division v. State, etc.
-
Johnson Engineering & Maintenance Co. v. State ex rel. Alexander
506 So. 2d 876
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Haughton Elevator Division v. State, through the Division of Administration
-
Bristol Steel & Iron Works, Inc. v. State, Department of Transportation & Development
504 So. 2d 941
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Division of Administration
-
Pittman Const. Co., Inc. v. PARISH OF E. BATON ROUGE
493 So. 2d 178
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
App. 5th Cir.1976); Budd Construction Company, (La.App.
-
AMERICAN WASTE AND POLLUTION CONTROL CO. v. Madison Parish Police Jury
488 So. 2d 940
La. 1986
Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Etc., Wallace Stevens, Inc. v. Lafourche Parish Hospital District No. 3, (La.
-
In Re Beychok
484 So. 2d 912
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
[6] In Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Etc., the Supreme Court stated: The Louisiana jurisprudence interpreting this statute or its predecessors has long established that a low bidder may on a contract so advertised sue to set aside the award of the contract to another bidder and may enjoin the agency from the execution of such contract, where the age
-
Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. STATE EX REL. DIV. OF ADMIN.
486 So. 2d 95
La. 1986
Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Division of Administration, is a case which entailed a suit to enjoin the letting of a bid to another.
-
Daves Ins. Agency, Inc. v. State
488 So. 2d 705
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Haughton Elevator Division v. State of Louisiana, Through The Division of Administration, Housing Authority of Opelousas v. Pittman Construction Company, 264 F.2d 695 (5th Cir. 1959).
-
Waste v. Madison Parish Police Jury
480 So. 2d 761
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Haughton Elevator Division v. State, etc.
-
Alexander and Alexander, Inc. v. State
470 So. 2d 976
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Division of Administration
-
Bundrick v. Lafayette Parish Police Jury
462 So. 2d 1319
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
and, Equitable Petroleum Corp. v. Central Transmission, Inc., (La.App.
-
Vienna Bend Subdivision Homeowners Ass'n v. Manning
459 So. 2d 1345
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
and, Equitable Petroleum Corp. v. Central Transmission, Inc., (La.App.
-
North Cent. Util. v. Walker Comm. Water Sys.
437 So. 2d 922
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
The Louisiana Supreme Court, declared that "[A] low bidder may ...
-
Ted Hicks & Associates, Inc. v. Stroud
434 So. 2d 1157
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Houghton Elevator Division v. State, Division of Administration, Budd Construction Company, (La.App.
-
Deer Slayers v. LA. MOTEL AND INV. CORP.
434 So. 2d 1183
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
art. 3601; Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Etc.
-
Equitable Petroleum v. Cent. Transmission
431 So. 2d 1084
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co.
-
Bilongo v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources
428 So. 2d 1021
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Haughton Elevator Division v. State, through the Division of Administration
-
E. Lionel Pavlo Engineering Co. v. State
429 So. 2d 454
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
These two possible theories are (1) and (2) that the contract with Buchart-Horn was not confected in conformity with the requirements of LSA-R.S.
-
Huber Oil Co. of Louisiana, Inc. v. Save-Time
422 So. 2d 597
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
dealt with a disqualified bidder's right to a fair hearing in connection with the Public Contract law requiring the letting of public contracts to the lowest qualified bidder.
-
Hays v. City of Baton Rouge
421 So. 2d 347
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Etc., (La.App.
-
Millette Enterprises, Inc. v. STATE ETC.
417 So. 2d 6
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Division of Administration
-
Guidry v. Primeaux
410 So. 2d 1249
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Article 3601, et seq.; Haughton Elevator Division v. State of Louisiana, Through the Division of Administration, Schwegmann Brothers Giant Super Markets v. Louisiana Milk Commission, supra; Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co., supra.
-
Budd Const. Co., Inc. v. City of Alexandria
401 So. 2d 1070
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Division of Administration
-
Taylor & Taylor Builders, Inc. v. Moore
393 So. 2d 792
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
See Haughton Elevator Division v. State, etc.
-
State, Through Office of Governor v. LW EATON CONST. CO.
392 So. 2d 477
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Haughton Elevator Division v. State, through the Division of Administration
-
Williams v. BOARD OF SUP'RS, ETC.
388 So. 2d 438
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
the State had disqualified Haughton, the lowest bidder on elevator maintenance contracts, as not being a "responsible" bidder under the public bid laws.
-
Daigre Engineers, Inc. v. City of Winnfield
385 So. 2d 866
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
In the case of Haughton Elevator Division v. State, etc., the right of a low bidder on a public contract to prevent the award of the contract to a higher bidder in violation of the public bid laws was recognized as entitled to protection by an injunction.
-
Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co.
373 So. 2d 488
La. 1979
Schwegmann Bros. Giant Super Mkts.