DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hatcher, 372 So. 2d 1024.

125 citing documents.

  • State v. Davis 449 So. 2d 466 La. 1984
  • State v. Vessell 450 So. 2d 938 La. 1984
    (on rehearing), and cases cited therein.
  • State v. Moore 440 So. 2d 134 La. 1983
    sets forth guidelines for determining the admissibility of evidence of other crimes.
  • State v. Anderson 440 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Ester 436 So. 2d 543 La. 1983
  • State v. Kahey 436 So. 2d 475 La. 1983
  • State v. Henry 436 So. 2d 510 La. 1983
  • State v. Humphrey 431 So. 2d 751 La. 1982
    For example, (on rehearing), we set forth the following rules for determining when other crimes exhibiting almost identical modus operandi, committed in close proximity to the charged offense, will be admissible: In order to be admissible the extraneous offense evidence must meet several tests: (1) there must be clear an
  • State v. West 419 So. 2d 868 La. 1982
    or that a conversation took place.
  • State v. Talbert 416 So. 2d 97 La. 1982
    this Court discussed fully the requirements for admissibility of other crimes evidence under the modus operandi exception.
  • State v. Feeback 414 So. 2d 1229 La. 1982
  • State v. Moore 414 So. 2d 340 La. 1982
  • State v. Huizar 414 So. 2d 741 La. 1982
  • State v. Humphrey 412 So. 2d 507 La. 1982
    This court's decision on defendant's writ application, [2]
  • State v. Leatherwood 411 So. 2d 29 La. 1982
  • State v. Goza 408 So. 2d 1349 La. 1982
    [1] , appeal after remand
  • State v. Middlebrook 409 So. 2d 588 La. 1982
  • State v. Naas 409 So. 2d 535 La. 1981
  • State v. McDermitt 406 So. 2d 195 La. 1981
  • State v. Hennigan 404 So. 2d 222 La. 1981
    Toomer noted that evidence is not hearsay when offered to prove only that it occurred, or that a conversation took place.
  • State v. Littleton 395 So. 2d 730 La. 1981
  • State v. Toomer 395 So. 2d 1320 La. 1981
    This Court has held that evidence is non-hearsay when offered not to prove the truth of the facts recited but to prove that the utterance occurred, or that a conversation has taken place.
  • State v. Lee 381 So. 2d 792 La. 1980
  • State v. Humphrey 381 So. 2d 813 La. 1980
  • State v. McIntyre 381 So. 2d 408 La. 1980