Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. LeBlanc, 367 So. 2d 335.

33 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jamel Malik La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Dwayne Piper A/K/A Marcus Piper La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Piper 269 So. 3d 952 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
See State v. LeBlanc , , 341 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Rogers Lacaze 239 So. 3d 807 La. 2018
State v. Lacaze 208 So. 3d 856 La. 2016
State v. Molere 99 So. 3d 1050 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 4/9/03) , ; State v. Demise, 98-0541 (La.4/3/01), ; (La.App.
State v. Bellelo 950 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
the Court was again faced with a case where there had been no recordation of a misdemeanor trial.
State v. LaCaze 759 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
The court stated: First, we find defendant's reliance on [ State v.] LeBlanc, [ (La.
State v. Sorenson 725 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
In Re Lemoine 686 So. 2d 837 La. 1997
See, (reversing a criminal conviction and remanding for a new trial on the basis that the trial judge should have recused himself); (reversing conviction, remanding for new trial based on judge's failure to recuse); (reversing lower courts in a criminal case and granting a motion to recuse); (La.App.
State v. Denomes 674 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Serio 670 So. 2d 1273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
art. 671, in which the Louisiana Supreme Court, addressing a recusal question, noted that the appearance of judicial impropriety or partiality is a paramount concern and is to be avoided at all costs.
State v. Ford 650 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Clark 644 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Smith 635 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Clark 638 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Defendant contends this alone should be grounds for reversal, and LSA-C.Cr.P.
State v. Turner 626 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
The defendant argues that it was not necessary for him to move for recordation or to enter contemporaneous objections to the failure to record the missing portions, as his authority.
Pierce v. Charity Hosp. of Louisiana 550 So. 2d 211 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Krinke 533 So. 2d 1024 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
in which the court reversed a conviction not because of any evidence that the judge was impartial but because of the appearance of the impartiality.
State v. Loera 530 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Williams 517 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Bolen 514 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Code of Prof.Resp., Canon 9
State v. LaCour 493 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Browning 475 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Hardeman 467 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Augustine, 252 La.
State v. Elliott 467 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Augustine, 252 La.
State v. Counterman 461 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
NOTES [1] the court pretermitted a ruling on whether the intelligent waiver of La.
State v. Bennett 457 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
the Supreme Court found that the failure to make contemporaneous objections and to designate parts of the record for appellate review may procedurally bar the right of judicial review.
State v. Booth 448 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
the Supreme Court found that the failure to make contemporaneous objections and to designate parts of the record for appellate review may procedurally bar the right of judicial review.
In Re MAY 441 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Jones 409 So. 2d 649 La. 1981
State v. Savoie 409 So. 2d 650 La. 1981
State v. Boulmay 385 So. 2d 783 La. 1980