Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Young v. Clement, 367 So. 2d 828.

50 citing documents.

N. G. v. A. C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
John Mantiply and Melissa Sue Mantiply v. Joseph I. Hoffman, Jr., M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Mantiply v. Hoffman 263 So. 3d 1193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Doe v. DELTA WOMEN'S CLINIC OF BATON ROUGE 37 So. 3d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Waldrop v. Hurd 907 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Ls Huckabay, Md Memorial Hosp. v. Kpmg 843 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Creighton v. Bryant, supra .
Williams v. Holiday Inn Worldwide 816 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
DIVISION PLACE PART. v. Carl E. Woodward, Inc. 806 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Cartwright v. Chrysler Corporation, 255 La.
Creighton v. Bryant 793 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Asbestos v. Bordelon, Inc. 726 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
In re Medical Review Panel of Howard, 573 So.2d at 474
Quibodeaux v. Medical Center of Southwest Louisiana 707 So. 2d 1380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Quibodeaux v. MEDICAL CENTER OF SW LA. 707 So. 2d 1380 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Tichenor v. Roman Catholic Church 665 So. 2d 1307 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Dufour v. Mayeux 664 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Wimberly v. Schumpert Medical Center 641 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Griffin, supra; (La.App.
Wimberly v. Gatch 635 So. 2d 206 La. 1994
Hillman v. Akins 614 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Ward v. Abasi 616 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Smith v. MacArthur Surgical Clinic 610 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Richardson v. Moffett 608 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Jarreau v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 600 So. 2d 1389 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
(); Goodman v. Dixie Machine Welding & Metal Works, Inc., et al, (La.App.
Sharkey v. Sterling Drug, Inc. 600 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
In Re Medical Review Panel for Claim of Milton 593 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
[2] is misplaced because that case involved only the interruption of the one year prescriptive period.
Gore v. Snider 590 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Brady v. Bunge Corp. 582 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Beth Israel v. Bartley, Inc. 579 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
In Re Medical Review Panel of Howard 573 So. 2d 472 La. 1991
Olivier v. Poirier 563 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Maung v. May 556 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Goodman v. Dixie MacH. Welding & Metal Works, Inc. 552 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Leyva v. Laga 549 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Chandarlis v. Shah 535 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Herron v. Pendleton Memorial Methodist Hospital 527 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
and call for inquiry.” More recently, the Supreme Court declared: (prescription does not run against one who is ignorant of the existence of facts that would entitle him to bring a malpractice action, as long as such ignorance is not willful and does not result from his neglect.
Welch v. St. Francis Medical Center, Inc. 521 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Poole v. Physicians & Surgeons Hosp. 516 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Cordova v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Griffin v. Kinberger 507 So. 2d 821 La. 1987
Monceaux v. Bernauer 498 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Hutson v. Madison Parish Police Jury 496 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
3d Cir.1978), writ granted, affirmed in part and reversed in part on other grounds
Malbrough v. Hamsa 463 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Ledet v. Miller 459 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Gunter v. Plauche 439 So. 2d 437 La. 1983
Ramirez v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 433 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Stewart v. Highland Hospital 412 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Andrus v. Patton 394 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
and Cordova v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company and Dr. A and Dr. B
Castrillo v. Stimulation Technology, Inc. 393 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Cordova v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 387 So. 2d 574 La. 1980
where we stated: "Prescription does not run against one who is ignorant of the existence of facts that would entitle him to bring a malpractice action as long as such ignorance is not willful and does not result from his neglect."
Hebert v. Confederate Memorial Medical Center 381 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
made the identical statement: "Prescription does not run against one who is ignorant of the existence of facts that would entitle him to bring a malpractice action, as long as such ignorance is not willful and does not result from his neglect."
Cordova v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 378 So. 2d 1088 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, supra, where the doctrine was applied in medical malpractice cases.
Lynch v. Foster 376 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
2 Cir. 1978), writ denied, ; Perrin v. Rodriquez, 153 So.
Zeno v. Lincoln General Hospital 376 So. 2d 1284 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
On the issue of whether the one-year prescriptive period has run, has recently stated the rule as follows: Prescription does run against one who is ignorant of the existence of facts that would entitle him to bring a malpractice action, as long as such ignorance is not willful and does not result from his neglect.