Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. English, 367 So. 2d 815.

47 citing documents.

State v. Reeves 11 So. 3d 1031 La. 2009
State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
Id.; ("Arguably, the extinction of a debt by killing the creditor is the gaining of something of value under the statute, but there is no[ ] evidence that the defendant intended to condition the release of the victim upon the payment of ransom, and it is that intent which distinguishes aggravated from simple
State v. Brooks 765 So. 2d 993 La. 1999
State v. Howard 751 So. 2d 783 La. 1999
State v. Frost 727 So. 2d 417 La. 1998
this Court noted that while the test of the defendant's criminal responsibility is provided solely by a right or wrong test insofar as the issue is the defendant's guilt, once guilt has been established another dimension of his mental condition comes into play as affecting whether the jury will recomme
State v. Thibodeaux 728 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Mitchell 674 So. 2d 250 La. 1996
art. 905.5(e), defendant argues that he was required to give a (La.
State v. Thompson 665 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
727 , 58 L.Ed.2d 708 (1978); (La.App.
State v. Martin 645 So. 2d 190 La. 1994
State v. Brown 557 So. 2d 1085 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Arnold 548 So. 2d 920 La. 1989
appendix at 823 (La.1979)
State v. Johnson 541 So. 2d 818 La. 1989
1981) (two consecutive shootings); (two consecutive shootings); (La.
State v. Ford 525 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Brown 514 So. 2d 99 La. 1987
See, (hearsay proof of prior murder conviction improperly admitted).
State v. Brooks 505 So. 2d 714 La. 1987
State v. Doolittle 482 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Harris 480 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
1983); (appendix); (La.App.
State v. Branch 475 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
14:44, comment; , appendix at 823 (La.
State v. Williams 480 So. 2d 721 La. 1985
State v. David 468 So. 2d 1126 La. 1984
This is not a situation where, as in State v. Brogden, supra, the limiting construction does no apparent violence to *1132 the legislative intent.
State v. Stewart 458 So. 2d 1289 La. 1984
State v. Brogdon 457 So. 2d 616 La. 1984
State v. Welcome 458 So. 2d 1235 La. 1984
State v. Hunter 454 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Wright 446 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Rault 445 So. 2d 1203 La. 1984
defendant's capital punishment sentence was set aside because one of the aggravating circumstances successfully relied on by the state, that the defendant had been previously convicted of an unrelated murder, was established by hearsay evidence.
State v. Rodrigue 441 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
14:44, comment; , appendix at 823 (La.1979).
State v. Jordan 440 So. 2d 716 La. 1983
State v. Anderson 440 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Moore 432 So. 2d 209 La. 1983
State v. Taylor 422 So. 2d 109 La. 1982
1979) (on original hearing)
State v. Sawyer 422 So. 2d 95 La. 1982
[15] in which this court reversed a death sentence because the state failed properly to authenticate certain documents offered at the penalty trial.
State v. Perry 420 So. 2d 139 La. 1982
State v. Washington 407 So. 2d 1138 La. 1981
State v. Washington 407 So. 2d 1138 La. 1981
State v. Sermon 404 So. 2d 261 La. 1981
State v. Sonnier 402 So. 2d 650 La. 1981
State v. Monroe 397 So. 2d 1258 La. 1981
State v. Culberth 390 So. 2d 847 La. 1980
this court stated that this aggravating circumstance is established when the defendant by a single and consecutive course of conduct contemplates and causes a great risk to more than one person.
State v. Clark 389 So. 2d 1335 La. 1980
State v. Clark 387 So. 2d 1124 La. 1980
(on original hearing); (La.
State v. Myles 389 So. 2d 12 La. 1980
State v. Williams 383 So. 2d 369 La. 1980
2960 , 49 L.Ed.2d 913 (1976); (La.
State v. Sonnier 380 So. 2d 1 La. 1980
See State v. Myles (La.1979) (No. 63567)
State v. Gordy 380 So. 2d 1347 La. 1980
State v. Sonnier 379 So. 2d 1336 La. 1980
State v. Martin 376 So. 2d 300 La. 1979