Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Goodbier, 367 So. 2d 356.

22 citing documents.

State v. Alridge 249 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Frank , 99-0553, p. 21 , 803 So.2d at 20 (citing State v. Goodbier , , 357 (La.
State v. Handy 226 So. 3d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Second, “inconsequential omissions or slight inaccuracies do not require reversal.” Frank, 99-0553, p. 21, 803 So.2d at 20 ( (La.
State v. Jones 220 So. 3d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Second, “inconsequential omissions or slight inaccuracies do not require reversal.” Frank , 99-0553, p. 21, 803 So.2d at 20 ( (La.
State of Louisiana v. Debbie E. Adams AKA Debbie Adams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
(reversal not required when record does not include a transcript of the voir dire examination and affidavit of court reporter indicated that counsel made no objections during voir dire).
State of Louisiana v. Mark Wayne Thibodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
(reversal not required when record does not include a transcript of the voir dire examination and affidavit of court reporter indicated that counsel made no objections during voir dire).
State v. Thibodeaux 162 So. 3d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
(reversal not required when record does not include a transcript of the voir dire examination and affidavit of court reporter indicated that counsel made no objections during voir dire).
State v. Lampkin 119 So. 3d 158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See Neely, 3 So.3d at 537-38
State of Louisiana v. L. W. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
(reversal required in second degree murder case in which record missing the testimony of four state witnesses and the voir dire of prospective jurors); (absence of voir dire transcript from the record did not compromise defendant’s appeal when affidavit of the court report indicated that counsel failed to exhaust his peremptory challenges).
State v. Massey 51 So. 3d 808 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Second, “inconsequential omissions or slight inaccuracies do not require reversal.” Frank, supra, (declining to reverse when record did not include transcript of voir dire examination and the court reporter’s affidavit indicated that no objections were made by the attorneys during voir dire); (La.App.
State v. Johnson 22 So. 3d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
(reversal not required when record did not include a transcript of the voir dire, and examination and affidavit of court reporter indicated that counsel made no objections during voir dire).
State v. Stukes 19 So. 3d 1233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Second, “inconsequential omissions or slight inaccuracies do not require reversal.” Frank, supra, (declining to reverse when ^record did not include transcript of voir dire examination and the court reporter’s affidavit indicated that no objections were made by the attorneys during voir dire); (La.App.
State v. Pinion 968 So. 2d 131 La. 2007
(reversal required in second degree murder case in which record missing the testimony of four state witnesses and the voir dire of prospective jurors); (absence of voir dire transcript from the record did not compromise defendant's appeal when affidavit of the court report indicated that counsel failed to exhaust his peremptory challenges).
State v. Scott 952 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Scott 913 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Frank, supra, (declining to reverse when record did not include transcript of voir dire examination and the court reporter's affidavit indicated that no objections were made by the attorneys during voir dire); (La.App.
State v. Young 839 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
(declining to reverse when record did not include transcript of voir dire examination and court reporter's affidavit indicated that no objections were made by the attorneys during voir dire); see also State v. Simpson, XXXX-XXXX, p. 14 (La.App.
State v. Simpson 829 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Frank, supra ((declining to reverse when record did not include transcript of voir dire examination and court reporter's affidavit indicated that no objections were made by the attorneys during voir dire)); (La.App.
State v. Harry 823 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Frank, supra ((declining to reverse when record did not include transcript of voir dire examination and court reporter's affidavit indicated that no objections were made by the attorneys during voir dire)); (La.App.
State v. Chattman 800 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
(reversal not required when record does not include a transcript of the voir dire examination and affidavit of court reporter indicated that counsel made no objections during voir dire).
State v. Frank 803 So. 2d 1 La. 2001
(reversal not required when record does not include a transcript of the voir dire examination and affidavit of court reporter indicated that counsel made no objections during voir dire).
State v. Hoffman 768 So. 2d 542 La. 2000
State v. Bridges 545 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
267 , 54 L.Ed.2d 177 (1977); State v. Plaisance, 252 La.
State v. Dollar 372 So. 2d 1220 La. 1979