Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bonier, 367 So. 2d 824.

38 citing documents.

State ex rel. C.B. 251 So. 3d 562 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Jasper 149 So. 3d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State ex rel. X.F. 143 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
“any gas, liquid or other substance or instrumentality, which, in the manner used, is calculated or likely to produce death or great bodily harm.” “The term ‘dangerous weapon’ is not limit *1210 ed to those instrumentalities ‘which are inherently dangerous, but includes any instrumentality which in the manner used, is calculated or likely to produce death or great bodily harm.”’ See also State in the Interest of Ruschel, (La.App.
State v. Sellers 128 So. 3d 1235 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
14:2(3); State v. Singleton, 48,114 (La.App.
State v. Singleton 117 So. 3d 306 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
14:2(3); State v. Bowers, 39,970 (La.
State v. Celestine 92 So. 3d 335 La. 2012
(In making the determination whether defendant used a dangerous instrumentality to commit a robbery, “the jury may find that there was an actual likely danger of serious bodily harm, to anyone present in the highly charged atmosphere of the scene of a robbery, taking into consideration the great possibi
State of Louisiana v. M S La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Richard D. Jasper La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Jasper 75 So. 3d 984 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Pleasant 66 So. 3d 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In re K.M., 10-0649, p. 5 (La.App.
State ex rel. W.H. 62 So. 3d 839 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State Ex Rel. Wh 62 So. 3d 839 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
State Ex Rel. Km 49 So. 3d 460 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
See also State in the Interest of Ruschel, (La.
State ex rel. K.M. 49 So. 3d 460 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
See also State in the Interest of Ruschel, (La.App.
State v. Black 41 So. 3d 1243 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
State v. Davis 975 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Ragas 960 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Cotton, 94-384, p. 2 (La.App.
State v. Malhiot 938 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Lewis 892 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
The Court enunciated a to determine whether a defendant has in fact used a dangerous weapon in the commission of an offense.
State v. Johnson 890 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
State v. Jeselink 799 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. McClure 793 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Rainey 722 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Ellis 672 So. 2d 1007 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Price 636 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Johnson 598 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Munoz 575 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
State Ex Rel. Richey v. Butler 572 So. 2d 1043 La. 1991
-27 (La.1979); see also Reed v. Butler, 866 F.2d 128 (5th Cir.1989), cert.
State v. Clark 527 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Woods 494 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
The Court enunciated a to determine whether a defendant has in fact used a dangerous weapon in the commission of an offense.
State v. Taylor 485 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State in Interest of Cox 461 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State in Interest of Ruschel 411 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
State v. Watson 397 So. 2d 1337 La. 1981
State v. Gould 395 So. 2d 647 La. 1981
State v. Baldwin 388 So. 2d 664 La. 1980
State v. Martin 376 So. 2d 300 La. 1979