Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Woods, Slayback & Co. v. Rocchi, 32 La. Ann. 210.

5 citing documents.

Stevens-Davis Co. v. Liberty Industrial Life Ins. Co. 126 So. 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
As defendant, when knowledge of the manager’s acceptance came to him, failed to disavow the manager’s authority to bind him by the acceptance, he became bound thereby, and in the absence of such a disavowal, anything defendant may have added to the order, as accepted by his agent, was not binding on plaintiff, without its consent * * *» In the case of Woods, Slayback & Co. vs. Rocchi, , the court said: “* * * The contract, as actually made by the broker on behalf of Rocchi, was brought to hi
Apple Growers Ass'n v. Kohlman Bros. 8 La. App. 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
But primarily he is deemed merely the agent of the party by whom he is originally employed; and he becomes the agent of the other party, only when the bargain or contract is definitively settled, as to its terms between the principals.” Story on Agency, S. 31 Woods, Slayback & Co. vs. Rocchi, ; C. C. 3017; So.
State ex rel. Le Blanc v. Twenty-First Judicial District Democratic Committee 47 So. 405 La. 1908
In the Newman Case, , the court said that in the absence of positive provision of law it would be without authority for treating a final judgment rendered in a mandamus proceeding differently from other final judgment.
State ex rel. Union Sawmill Co. v. Summit Lumber Co. 42 So. 195 La. 1906
Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Shreveport Cotton Oil Co. 35 So. 610 La. 1903
of Law (2d Ed.) p. 966; .