DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., 369 So. 2d 1043.

71 citing documents.

  • Chandler v. Bunge Corp. 489 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc.
  • Johnson v. Patcraft Mills, Inc. 486 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • Booty v. Kentwood Manor Nursing Home, Inc. 483 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    In Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., this doctrine is defined as follows: Res ipsa loquitur is merely a rule of circumstantial evidence whereby negligence is inferred on the part of the defendant because the facts indicate such to be the most probable cause of the injury.
  • Romero v. Continental Insurance Co. 467 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., and King v. King, *87 253 La.
  • Galloway v. Ioppolo 464 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., (La.
  • Free v. Franklin Guest Home, Inc. 463 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    As stated in the more recent case of Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., : Res ipsa loquitur is merely a rule of circumstantial evidence whereby negligence is inferred on the part of the defendant because the facts indicate such to be the most probable cause of the injury.
  • Thompson v. Ewin 457 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc.
  • Dunne v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 444 So. 2d 1317 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    In addition to the above requirements a landowner's liability is further governed by the test stated in Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., (La.
  • Congelton v. BATON ROUGE GENERAL HOSP. 444 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc.
  • Peyton v. Bogan 434 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc.
  • Audubon Ins. Co. v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. 425 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    Walter v. Union Oil Mill, Inc.
  • Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. CHAMPION CHEM., INC. 420 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    See, also, Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., which states: "In determining an owner's liability under Civil Code Articles 2315 and 2316 the test has been stated to be whether in the management of his property he has acted as a reasonable man in view of the probability of injury to others.
  • Head v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 408 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., (La.
  • Lacombe v. Greathouse 407 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    Shelton, supra; Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., (La.
  • Kaplan v. Missouri Pacific R. Co. 409 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., supra.
  • Ramphrey v. Highlands Ins. Co. 406 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
    Plaintiffs cite Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., in which it was noted that the manifest error rule was not applicable to findings of fact made from a review of the transcript by a trial judge who had succeeded the judge who tried the case.
  • Broussard v. Pennsylvania Millers Mut. Ins. Co. 398 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    Walker v. Union Mill, Inc., King v. King, 253 La.
  • Guillory v. Buller 398 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    See also Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., (La.App.
  • Frantz v. Morrison Home Center, Inc. 388 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    3rd Cir. 1978), writ denied, La., , writ granted, La., , case affirmed
  • Gauthier v. Bogard Seed Co. 377 So. 2d 1290 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    In the recent case of Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., our Supreme Court said the following with respect to the application of that doctrine: "The real test of applying res ipsa loquitur is: Do the facts of the controversy suggest negligence of the defendant, rather than some other factor, as the most plausible explanation of the accident?
  • Harris v. Ferguson 375 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    After the recent decision of our Supreme Court in Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., it appears to be settled that the manifest error rule is not applicable in a case such as this.