Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Harris, 368 So. 2d 1066.
- State v. Jackson 212 So. 3d 1177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
-
State v. Williams
975 So. 2d 748
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
See, State v. Michael, 39,439 (La.App.2d Cir.1/7/05), , writ denied, 2005-0354 (La.6/17/05), .
- State v. Michael 891 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
- State ex rel. Smith v. State 885 So. 2d 512 La. 2004
- State v. Rochelle 877 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
-
State v. Black
706 So. 2d 423
La. 1997
1684 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961), applies only if bad faith shown); , 1073 n. 13 (La.1979) (not every *425 probationer facing revocation is "entitled to compulsory process in order to have live witnesses present at the hearing"); ("the Miranda [ v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct.
-
State v. Castille
623 So. 2d 1350
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that in the absence of a conviction the testimony of a probation officer was insufficient to support the revocation of a defendant’s probation where no supporting evidence was provided to prove the fact of the underlying criminal conduct.
- State v. Collins 560 So. 2d 836 La. 1990
- State v. Coates 528 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
- State v. Pleasant 508 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
- State v. Esprinal 488 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
- State v. Martin 482 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- State v. Wagner 410 So. 2d 1089 La. 1982
- State v. Smith 415 So. 2d 930 La. 1982
-
State, in Interest of Wright
387 So. 2d 75
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
1756 , 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973); and State ex rel.
- State v. Lucas 385 So. 2d 253 La. 1980
- State v. Rideau 376 So. 2d 1251 La. 1979
- State v. Sussmann 374 So. 2d 1256 La. 1979