Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Harris, 368 So. 2d 1066.

18 citing documents.

  • State v. Jackson 212 So. 3d 1177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Williams 975 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    See, State v. Michael, 39,439 (La.App.2d Cir.1/7/05), , writ denied, 2005-0354 (La.6/17/05), .
  • State v. Michael 891 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • State ex rel. Smith v. State 885 So. 2d 512 La. 2004
  • State v. Rochelle 877 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Black 706 So. 2d 423 La. 1997
    1684 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961), applies only if bad faith shown); , 1073 n. 13 (La.1979) (not every *425 probationer facing revocation is "entitled to compulsory process in order to have live witnesses present at the hearing"); ("the Miranda [ v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct.
  • State v. Castille 623 So. 2d 1350 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that in the absence of a conviction the testimony of a probation officer was insufficient to support the revocation of a defendant’s probation where no supporting evidence was provided to prove the fact of the underlying criminal conduct.
  • State v. Collins 560 So. 2d 836 La. 1990
  • State v. Coates 528 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Pleasant 508 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Esprinal 488 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Martin 482 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Wagner 410 So. 2d 1089 La. 1982
  • State v. Smith 415 So. 2d 930 La. 1982
  • State, in Interest of Wright 387 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
    1756 , 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973); and State ex rel.
  • State v. Lucas 385 So. 2d 253 La. 1980
  • State v. Rideau 376 So. 2d 1251 La. 1979
  • State v. Sussmann 374 So. 2d 1256 La. 1979