Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Cox, 369 So. 2d 118.

220 citing documents.

State v. Celestine 540 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Moya 539 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Berry 534 So. 2d 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Ballard 534 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
art. 894.1 provides criteria for consideration in determining whether a sentence is excessive and mandates that the “trial court shall state for the factual basis therefore in imposing sentence.”
State v. Mallett 535 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Sepulvado, supra.
State v. Everett 530 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. McNaulty 527 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
However, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that *542 where the trial judge imposes a sentence without adequate compliance with the mandatory requirements of article 894.1, that he state the considerations and the factual basis for his sentence, the reviewing court may vacate a sentence and remand for re-sentencing wh
State v. Broussard 527 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Naquin 527 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Davis 528 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
2d 1013 (La.1977); appeal after remand (La.App.
State v. Cunningham 525 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
the imposition of a sentence, although within the statutory limit, may violate a defendant’s constitutional right against excessive punishment that is enforceable by this court on appellate review of his conviction.” overruled jurisprudence holding excessiveness of a sentence may not be reviewed in the absence of formal objection.
State v. Ford 517 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Hall 514 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
As defendant correctly argues, where two offenses arise out of a single course of conduct, concurrent rather than consecutive sentences are favored, “in the absence of a showing that the public safety requires a longer sentence.” However, in selecting an appropriate sentence the trial judge is not limited to considering only a defendant’s prior convictions, but may properly review all prior criminal activity.
State v. Moten 510 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Braxton 509 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Thibodeaux 509 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Smith 509 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Lewis 509 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Alfred 510 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Chaisson 507 So. 2d 248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Sims 505 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Boudreaux 504 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Coates 509 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
[2] the Louisiana Supreme Court indicated that a literal reading of La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Tate 506 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Thibodeaux 502 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Davis 499 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Donahue 499 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Dorsey 498 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Cottingin 496 So. 2d 1379 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Lutes 496 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Schell 492 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Scott 490 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
1981); we have been careful to limit this rule to prevent the defendant from being relieved of all obligations for objection in connection with sentence review.
State v. Lewis 489 So. 2d 1055 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Wagster 489 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Johnson 486 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Sims 483 So. 2d 1006 La. 1986
State v. Balfa 485 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. McShane 484 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Cushman 481 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Trahan 481 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Arvel 481 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Hartman 479 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Racine 480 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Jennings 479 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Brown 479 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Smith 479 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Nelson 477 So. 2d 1321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Murray 476 So. 2d 1170 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Buie 477 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Camps 476 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985