DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Moses v. Mosley, 146 So. 2d 263.

15 citing documents.

  • Spradlin v. ACADIA ST. LANDRY MED. FOUND. 711 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    3 Cir., , we summarized established jurisprudence to the following effect: `(W)here a statute is enacted to protect the class of persons in which the plaintiff is included against the type of loss or injury which in fact has been sustained, an unexcused violation of such a statute is `negligence per se,' and this neglige
  • Pence v. Ketchum 326 So. 2d 831 La. 1976
    473 , (1960); Lee v. Carwile, La.App., (1964); Moses v. Mosley, La.App., (1962); Soronen v. Olde Milford Inn, 84 N.J.Super.
  • Motors Insurance Corp. v. Thomas 315 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
  • Campbell v. American Home Assurance Co. 241 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
  • Dove v. Messina 230 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    Co., " Again in Ervin v. Burns, La.App., 126 So.
  • Crockett v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 229 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
  • Ardoin v. Travelers Ins. Co. 229 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
  • Crain v. W. R. Core Construction Co. 215 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
  • Arnold v. Traders & General Insurance 204 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    2d 129 (La.App.3d Cir.1961); ” If the rain was so heavy that Lofton could only see five to ten feet ahead of the vehicle, he was negligent in operating the vehicle at a rate of speed at which he could not stop in time to avoid the accident.
  • Ward v. Rasberry & Clarke, Inc. 195 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    1st Cir. 1965); (La.App.
  • Hernandez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 192 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
  • Lee v. Peerless Insurance Company 183 So. 2d 328 La. 1966
    473 , ; Lee v. Carwile, La.App., ; Moses v. Mosley, La.App., ; Soronen v. Olde Milford Inn, 84 N.J.Super.
  • Jackson v. Beechwood, Inc. 180 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    Judge Hood, citing the Dixie case with approval, used the following language at page 267 of Moses v. Mosley, La.App., : “We think the jurisprudence is established to the effect that where a statute is enacted to protect the class of persons in which the plaintiff is included against the type of loss or injury which in fact has been sustained, an unexcused violation of such a statute is ‘negligence per se,’ and this negligence is acti
  • Thibodeaux v. Jack's Cookie Corporation 169 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
  • Lee v. Carwile 168 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
    3 Cir., , we summarized established jurisprudence to the following effect: "[W]here a statute is enacted to protect the class of persons in which the plaintiff is included against the type of loss or injury which in fact has been sustained, an unexcused violation of such a statute is `negligence per se,' and this neglige