DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Fryar v. Guste, 371 So. 2d 742.

14 citing documents.

  • Posner v. Gautreaux 192 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    the Louisiana Supreme Court acknowledged that “[w]e- have no thought of ■ weakening any protection -afforded by [La.
  • Does v. Foti 15 So. 3d 972 La. 2009
    this Court noted that La.
  • In Re Matter Under Investigation 15 So. 3d 972 La. 2009
    this Court noted that La.
  • Gannett River States Publishing Corp. v. Monroe City School Board 8 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
  • Baumann v. Shelton 986 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • Skamangas v. Stockton 867 So. 2d 1009 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • Kyle v. Perrilloux 868 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Tyler 701 So. 2d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    the Supreme Court defined a confidential informant as follows: one who has or claims to have knowledge of a particular criminal matter or event and is only willing to give such information to representatives of a law enforcement agency provided his identity is kept secret or in confidence [emphasis add
  • Revere v. Reed 675 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    App. 1st Cir.1978), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, (1979).
  • Treadway v. Jones 583 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
  • Freeman v. Guaranty Broadcasting Corp. 498 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • Hill v. Mamoulides 482 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    * * “D. Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent any and all prosecu-tive, investigative, and law enforcement agencies from having among themselves a free flow of information for the purpose of achieving coordinated and effective criminal justice.” (La.
  • Buratt v. Capital City Press, Inc. 459 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    LAW On May 21, 1979, the Louisiana Supreme Court handed down a
  • Kirsch v. Parker 375 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
    (Compare, analogously, the Supreme Court's refusal to honor law enforcement officers' promise of confidentiality to informers in Fryar v. Guste, La.1979, , 746: "we feel compelled to make the further observation that access to such [otherwise non-confidential] reports may not be blocked by a simple statement from one of the investigators that persons furnishing information were assured of confidentiality.