Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Andrews, 369 So. 2d 1049.

32 citing documents.

  • State v. Brown 1 So. 3d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    The Louisiana Supreme Court, -1052 (La., 1979), -19 (La.1978) and held that: In Louisiana the rule concerning the introduction of demonstrative evidence is that the foundation laid must establish that it is more probable than not that the evidence is connected with the case and that the evidence has som
  • Gagnard v. ZURICH AMER. INS. CO. 819 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    4 Cir.1990) () (emphasis added) (citations omitted).
  • State v. Thompson 665 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    727 , 58 L.Ed.2d 708 (1978); (La.App.
  • State v. Jackson 629 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Jackson 629 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Womack 592 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Trahan 576 So. 2d 1 La. 1991
  • Parmelee v. Martin Marietta Michoud Aerospace, Inc. 566 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Dietrich 567 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Lindsey 543 So. 2d 886 La. 1989
  • State v. Gremillion 529 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Hilburn 512 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Weiland 505 So. 2d 702 La. 1987
    involved a teenager who fatally stabbed another teenager and was sentenced to life imprisonment.
  • State v. Green 493 So. 2d 1178 La. 1986
  • State v. Martin 491 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    State v. Burton, 464 So.2d at 427 .
  • State v. Roux 487 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    stated at page 1051: "As in the case of any expert witness, the nature and extent of his education, training or experience should go to the weight of his testimony, rather than its admissibility."
  • State v. Fluitt 482 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Simpson 464 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Burton 464 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Jackson 452 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Freeman 447 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Rault 445 So. 2d 1203 La. 1984
  • State v. Johnson 438 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Daigle 440 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    In support of his contention, and LSA-C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Lindsey 428 So. 2d 420 La. 1983
    (La.1982) (a companion to Sawyer )
  • State v. Taylor 422 So. 2d 109 La. 1982
  • State v. Chapman 410 So. 2d 689 La. 1982
    -19 (La.1978)" -51 (La.1979).
  • State v. Belgard 410 So. 2d 720 La. 1982
  • State v. Prestridge 399 So. 2d 564 La. 1981
  • State v. Lee 395 So. 2d 700 La. 1981
    : "This Court is not unaware that the McNaughten test has long been under attack, but our legislature has by R.S.
  • State v. Toomer 395 So. 2d 1320 La. 1981
    held that: "Maps or diagrams generally are admissible to aid the jury in understanding testimony if shown to be an accurate representation of the subject matter in question and the ruling of the trial court relative to admissibility will not be disturbed on appeal unless there has been abuse of discre
  • State v. Roy 395 So. 2d 664 La. 1981