Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Clement, 368 So. 2d 1037.

31 citing documents.

  • State v. Baker 970 So. 2d 948 La. 2008
  • State v. Blanchard 776 So. 2d 1165 La. 2001
    (holding that "it is reasonable for the legislature in the interest of public welfare and safety to regulate the possession of firearms for a limited period of time by citizens who have committed certain specified serious felonies"); (holding that it is reasonable for the legislature in the interest of public welfare and safety to require the registration of a sawed-off shotgun whose customary use in times of peace is in the perpetration of crime).
  • State v. Smith 686 So. 2d 1009 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Powell 683 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Selvage 644 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Magee 552 So. 2d 1031 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Frank 549 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Sampay 532 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    art. 841 provides, in pertinent part, “An irregularity or error cannot be availed of after verdict unless it was objected to at the time of occurrence.” (La.
  • State v. Mayeux 526 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Goldsmith 519 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Blache 480 So. 2d 304 La. 1985
    we held that it was not erroneous for the trial judge to refuse to give a charge on justification in light of the evidence in that case, where an adult female took a gun from a small child inside a residence, placed it in her waistband, and left it there as she went to the store.
  • State v. Williams 471 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Guillot 470 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Hardeman 467 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Huddleston 463 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    ” the Court stated, at page 82: “Under provisions of La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Bailey 461 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Wilson 454 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Bennett 454 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Toomer, 395 So.2d at 1335
  • State v. Baldwin 448 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Johnson 438 So. 2d 1091 La. 1983
  • State v. Brooks 434 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    that where a prior arrest and conviction record was requested by defendant, but was not supplied, this failure would not require the setting aside of a verdict where no contemporaneous objection was made to the cross-examination of defendant with reference to a prior conviction.
  • State v. Terracina 430 So. 2d 64 La. 1983
  • State v. Rogers 428 So. 2d 932 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Simmons 422 So. 2d 138 La. 1982
  • State v. Magee 416 So. 2d 930 La. 1982
    See, State v. Colomb, 261 La.
  • State v. Grant 414 So. 2d 373 La. 1982
    where the defendant unsuccessfully urged the defense of justification for the weapon possession.
  • State v. Lane 414 So. 2d 1223 La. 1982
  • State v. Belgard 410 So. 2d 720 La. 1982
  • State v. Toomer 395 So. 2d 1320 La. 1981
  • State v. Williams 392 So. 2d 448 La. 1980
  • State v. Telford 384 So. 2d 347 La. 1980