Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dupre, 369 So. 2d 1303.
- State Of Louisiana v. Allen G. Causey La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
- State v. Parker 596 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
-
State v. Felix
556 So. 2d 1317
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
However, the State claims that evidence of arrest or pending charges is admissible if it has relevance independent of its impeachment value, (La.
- State v. Arnold 548 So. 2d 920 La. 1989
-
State v. Arnold
535 So. 2d 937
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
also cited by the State, is inapplicable, because aggravated kidnapping is there discussed as it pertains to other crimes evidence and jury instructions.
- State v. Harris 480 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
- State v. Desdunes 477 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- State v. James 459 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Hunter 454 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
- State v. Moore 419 So. 2d 963 La. 1982
- State v. Eastin 419 So. 2d 933 La. 1982
- State v. West 419 So. 2d 868 La. 1982
- State v. Dupre 408 So. 2d 1229 La. 1982
- State v. Thomas 406 So. 2d 1325 La. 1981
- State v. Sonnier 402 So. 2d 650 La. 1981
- State v. Stramiello 392 So. 2d 425 La. 1980
-
State v. Sonnier
380 So. 2d 1
La. 1980
This court has held that sexual gratification constitutes something of apparent value for purposes of this statute, (La.
- State v. Shelton 377 So. 2d 96 La. 1979
- State v. Polk 376 So. 2d 151 La. 1979
- State v. Durr 371 So. 2d 790 La. 1979