Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brown, 371 So. 2d 751.

32 citing documents.

  • State v. Potter 591 So. 2d 1166 La. 1991
  • State v. Wagster 489 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Taylor 483 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    ...” the Louisiana Supreme Court fully discussed the pertinent law in
  • State v. Whittaker 479 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    : The majority of this Court has held that a defendant is not denied equal protection when the state uses peremptory challenges to exclude blacks unless there is a systematic exclusion over a period of time; we impose upon the defendant the burden of establishing a prima facie showing of such exclusion.
  • State v. Bell 477 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Branch 475 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. James 459 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    824 , 13 L.Ed.2d 759 (1965)
  • State v. Williams 458 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    824 , 13 L.Ed.2d 759 (1965)
  • State v. Bennett 454 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    1st Cir.1983), appears the following: (La.
  • State v. Sterling 453 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    824 , 13 L.Ed.2d 759 (1965); rehearing denied 1979.
  • State v. Andrews 451 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Williams 445 So. 2d 1171 La. 1984
  • State v. Williams 442 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that a defendant is not denied equal protection when the state uses peremptory challenges to exclude blacks unless there is a systematic exclusion over a period of time.
  • State v. Square 433 So. 2d 104 La. 1983
  • State v. Vaughn 431 So. 2d 358 La. 1983
    824 , 13 L.Ed.2d 759 (1965)
  • State v. Chaney 423 So. 2d 1092 La. 1982
  • State v. Hayes 414 So. 2d 717 La. 1982
    *720 this Court set forth the pertinent law when a defendant alleges racially discriminatory use of peremptory challenges by the state: The majority of this Court has held that a defendant is not denied equal protection when the state uses peremptory challenges to exclude blacks unless there is a systematic
  • State v. Chapman 410 So. 2d 689 La. 1982
  • State v. Jones 408 So. 2d 1285 La. 1982
  • State v. Straughter 406 So. 2d 221 La. 1981
    this Court held that a defendant is not denied equal protection by the state's use of peremptory challenges against blacks unless there has been systematic exclusion of blacks over a period of time.
  • State v. Edwards 406 So. 2d 1331 La. 1981
  • State v. Francis 403 So. 2d 680 La. 1981
    In State v. Washington, supra, we found objective evidence of systematic exclusion of blacks through the use of peremptory challenges by the prosecutor over an extended period of time.
  • State v. Martin 400 So. 2d 1063 La. 1981
  • State v. Robinson 386 So. 2d 1374 La. 1980
    824 , 13 L.Ed.2d 759 (1965)
  • State v. Albert 381 So. 2d 424 La. 1980
  • State v. Prejean 379 So. 2d 240 La. 1980
    this court has held that a defendant is not denied equal protection by the state's use of peremptory challenges against blacks unless there is a systematic exclusion of blacks over a period of time.
  • State v. Manning 380 So. 2d 54 La. 1980
  • State v. Allen 380 So. 2d 28 La. 1980
    this court held that a defendant is not denied equal protection by the state's use of peremptory challenges against blacks unless there is a systematic exclusion of blacks over a period of time.
  • State v. Carthan 377 So. 2d 308 La. 1979
    Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202 , 85 S.Ct.
  • State v. Qualls 377 So. 2d 293 La. 1979
    824 , 13 L.Ed.2d 759 (1965); (La.
  • State v. Washington 375 So. 2d 1162 La. 1979
    824 , 13 L.Ed.2d 759 (1965)
  • State v. Washington 375 So. 2d 1162 La. 1979
    824 , 13 L.Ed.2d 759 (1965)