Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. George, 371 So. 2d 762.

37 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Michael Wallace La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana Versus Eletius Proby La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
However, “spontaneous and voluntary statements, not given as a result of police interrogation or compelling influence, are admissible in evidence without Miranda warnings even where a defendant is in custody.” (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Jakorey Williams La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
State v. Mickelson 210 So. 3d 893 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
2011 , 72 L.Ed.2d 467 (1982); (La.
State v. Estes 168 So. 3d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State of Louisiana v. Fermichael Harrison La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
692, 42 L.Ed.2d 690 (1975)
State of Louisiana v. Demarcus W. Law La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
692, 42 L.Ed.2d 690 (1975)
State v. Law 110 So. 3d 1271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
692 , 42 L.Ed.2d 690 (1975)
State v. Square 46 So. 3d 1239 La. 2010
The suppression of the statements that were “blurt[ed] out,” as the trial court found, runs contrary to this court’s -371 (La.1979) (“[The] defendant was not subjected to police interrogation while in the patrol car enroute to jail.
State v. Matthews 859 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
692 , 42 L.Ed.2d 690 (1975)
State v. Huckabay 809 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
(defendant who does not receive death penalty cannot complain that trial court improperly dismissed thirteen prospective jurors on Witherspoon grounds); (La.App.
State v. Guillory 715 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Higginbotham, 261 La.
State v. Durham 673 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
2011 , 72 L.Ed.2d 467 (1982); cert.
State v. Lee 559 So. 2d 1310 La. 1990
692 , 42 L.Ed.2d 690 (1975)
State v. Johnson 482 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Hardeman 467 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966)
State v. McFall 464 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Butler 462 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Johnson 457 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Chevalier 458 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
See State v. Jackson, supra; cert.
State v. Jackson 450 So. 2d 621 La. 1984
State v. Kirkpatrick 443 So. 2d 546 La. 1983
State v. Kohler 434 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Moore 432 So. 2d 209 La. 1983
State v. Perry, supra ; cert.
State v. Loyd 425 So. 2d 710 La. 1982
State v. Perry 420 So. 2d 139 La. 1982
State v. Webb 419 So. 2d 436 La. 1982
State v. Edwards 406 So. 2d 1331 La. 1981
at 765 (La.1979), this court observed that "examination of the Witherspoon decision discloses that the statute involved therein provided for a bifurcated proceeding similar to ours, allowing the jury the discretion to impose a sentence of death or imprisonment."
State v. Smith 407 So. 2d 652 La. 1981
State v. Higginbotham, 261 La.
State v. Francis 403 So. 2d 680 La. 1981
State v. Lindsey 404 So. 2d 466 La. 1981
State v. Whitt 404 So. 2d 254 La. 1981
we held that Article 798(2) had been amended to conform with Witherspoon v. Illinois, supra.
State v. Tompkins 403 So. 2d 644 La. 1981
State v. Castillo 389 So. 2d 1307 La. 1980
State v. Jones, supra ; State v. Higginbotham, 261 La.
State v. Hartman 388 So. 2d 688 La. 1980
State v. Jones 386 So. 2d 1363 La. 1980
No. 65,722 (La., May 19, 1980); (La.
State v. Robinson 384 So. 2d 332 La. 1980
State v. Higginbotham, 261 La.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by