Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Touchet, 372 So. 2d 1184.
- State v. Quintero 527 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. Freeman 474 So. 2d 1035 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
- State v. Vampran 459 So. 2d 1333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
-
State v. Martz
454 So. 2d 278
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
a four year sentence imposed on a 19 year old steadily employed first offender for distribution of marijuana at a profit of $1.00 was vacated after the trial judge was found not to have adequately followed the sentencing guidelines.
-
State v. Whorton
440 So. 2d 858
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Finally, the defendant contends that his sentence of five years imprisonment at hard labor and the additional fine of $1500 plus costs is excessive
-
State v. Shelby
438 So. 2d 1166
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Also, see Sepulvado, supra, at page 773 (Marcus, J., dissenting); (Marvin, Justice Ad Hoc, dissenting); (Summers, J., dissenting); (La.App.
-
State v. Boyette
434 So. 2d 456
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
does not satisfy the requirement that the trial court state for the record the considerations taken into account and the factual basis therefore in imposing sentence.” see also
-
State v. Lewis
430 So. 2d 1286
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
[4] Chief Judge Domengeaux's concurring opinion in State v. Goodman, supra, set forth: "I agree with the dissenting Justices in Sepulvado, supra; and consider that our review should be limited to whether the `law' subjects any person to excessive punishment, and not to whether a sentence in a particular case is excessive.
-
State v. Goodman
427 So. 2d 529
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
*534 I agree with the dissenting Justices in Sepulvado, supra; and consider that our review should be limited to whether the " law " subjects any person to excessive punishment, and not to whether a sentence in a particular case is excessive.
- State v. Robinson 423 So. 2d 1053 La. 1982
-
Distinguished
State v. McDonald
414 So. 2d 735
La. 1982
In this regard, where a sentence of four years at hard labor for distribution of marijuana was reversed.
- State v. Cupit 408 So. 2d 1108 La. 1981
- State v. Molinet 393 So. 2d 721 La. 1981
- State v. Green 390 So. 2d 1253 La. 1980
-
State v. LaFleur
391 So. 2d 445
La. 1980
NOTES [1] the trial judge also expressed a desire to teach young people a lesson when he sentenced the defendant for distribution of marijuana.
- State v. Franks 373 So. 2d 1307 La. 1979
- State v. Martin 372 So. 2d 563 La. 1979
- State v. Watson 372 So. 2d 1205 La. 1979