Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sonnier, 379 So. 2d 1336.

111 citing documents.

State v. Williams 458 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Johnson 457 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Brogdon 457 So. 2d 616 La. 1984
State v. Joseph 454 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
7 Wigmore on Evidence §§ 2100, 2115 (3rd Ed. 1940).
State v. Welcome 458 So. 2d 1235 La. 1984
Likewise, (original hearing), this court held that the aggravating circumstance was properly found in a case "where the offender kill[ed] two or more persons during a single consecutive course of conduct for the purpose of preventing any one of those killed from disclosing the murder of the other ...."
State v. Miller 451 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Glass 455 So. 2d 659 La. 1984
(Dennis, J., concurring in part); State v. Sonnier, supra at 1368 (on rehearing).
State v. Wright 445 So. 2d 1198 La. 1984
State v. Beck 445 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Celestine 443 So. 2d 1091 La. 1983
State v. Kirkpatrick 443 So. 2d 546 La. 1983
an original hearing (La.1979).
State v. Rodrigue 441 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Boutte 441 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
755 , (1972); ” We note that defendant was fully appraised of the charges against him in counts four and five because the severance affected only Joseph Richardson who was charged only in count one, which concerned another victim.
State v. Broadway 440 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Chapman 438 So. 2d 1319 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. McCarty 438 So. 2d 1296 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966)
State v. Berry 430 So. 2d 1005 La. 1983
2382 , 65 L.Ed.2d 392 (1980); State v. Felde, supra.
State v. James 431 So. 2d 399 La. 1983
NOTES [1] Justice Dennis has advanced this same argument in dissents in the following cases:
State v. Kohler 434 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Moore 432 So. 2d 209 La. 1983
State v. White 430 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
209 , 66 L.Ed.2d 90 (1980); cert denied 449 U.S. 1103 , 101 S.Ct.
State v. Smith 430 So. 2d 31 La. 1983
State v. Thomas 427 So. 2d 428 La. 1983
(on rehearing); See, 82-KA-2227; See also
State v. Morris 429 So. 2d 111 La. 1983
7 Wigmore on Evidence §§ 2100, 2115 (3rd Ed.1940).
State v. Lindsey 428 So. 2d 420 La. 1983
28, § 1; (on original hearing); (on rehearing).
State v. Narcisse 426 So. 2d 118 La. 1983
1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966)
State v. Taylor 422 So. 2d 109 La. 1982
State v. Shea 421 So. 2d 200 La. 1982
State v. Felde 422 So. 2d 370 La. 1982
State v. Copeland 419 So. 2d 899 La. 1982
See also, State ex rel., (Dennis, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); State v. Sonnier, supra at 1368 (on rehearing).
Distinguished State v. Brown 414 So. 2d 689 La. 1982
State v. Ellwest Stereo Theatres, Inc. 412 So. 2d 594 La. 1982
State v. Winn 412 So. 2d 1337 La. 1982
State v. Chapman 410 So. 2d 689 La. 1982
uror was acquainted with law enforcement people and had a brother-in-law who was a policeman, fourth prospective juror's son was a deputy and she knew other law enforcement officers); (one challenged juror had a brother and grandfather who were policemen, another juror's husband worked for the district attorney's office as an investigator); (challenged venireman's brother was sheriff in another parish); (juror was acquainted with prosecuting attorney); (challenged juror's husband was a police of
State v. Vaccaro 411 So. 2d 415 La. 1982
State v. Sugar 408 So. 2d 1329 La. 1982
*1331 (sister of sheriff in another parish); (wife of law enforcement officer); (aunt of police officer).
State v. Giovanni 409 So. 2d 593 La. 1982
State v. West 408 So. 2d 1302 La. 1982
1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966); State v. Petterway, supra
State v. Rodrigue 409 So. 2d 556 La. 1982
[1] Although the trial court possesses a broad range of discretion in this area, see, we are required to make an independent evaluation of the circumstances to determine whether the accused can receive a fair trial in the parish, unfettered by outside influence.
State v. Willie 410 So. 2d 1019 La. 1982
[1] Although *1024 the trial court possesses a broad range of discretion in this area, see, we are required to make an independent evaluation of the facts to determine whether the accused received a fair trial, unfettered by outside influences.
State v. Heard 408 So. 2d 1247 La. 1982
State v. Qualls, supra .
State v. Edwards 406 So. 2d 1331 La. 1981
(on rehearing); State v. Labostrie, supra
State v. MacK 403 So. 2d 8 La. 1981
For an excellent discussion of our review of erroneous instructions during the sentencing phase of capital cases
State v. Connor 403 So. 2d 678 La. 1981
State v. Lindsey 404 So. 2d 466 La. 1981
on original hearing (La.1979)
State v. McDonald 404 So. 2d 889 La. 1981
State v. Sermon 404 So. 2d 261 La. 1981
State v. Sonnier 402 So. 2d 650 La. 1981
State v. Claiborne 397 So. 2d 486 La. 1981
State v. Beavers 394 So. 2d 1218 La. 1981