Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lott v. Haley, 370 So. 2d 521.

199 citing documents.

COMMERCIAL CREDIT CLAIMS SER., INC. v. Richardson 454 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
LeDuff v. Gold Bond Building Products 452 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Givens v. Fifth District Levee Board 445 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Const. Art. I, § 23 (1974); U.S. Const. Art. I, § 10; ” Applying these principles to the present case, we find that the 1978 act created a vested right in the plaintiff to seek the fair market value of the property appropriated by the Levee Board.
Saucier v. Drs. Houston, Roy, Faust & Ewin 446 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
However, the Louisiana Supreme Court refused to apply La.R.S.
Great Atlantic Ins. v. MARTIN SERVICES INTERN. 445 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Coates v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. 444 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Terrebonne v. South Lafourche Tidal Control 445 So. 2d 1221 La. 1984
Const. Art. I, § 23 (1974); U.S. Const. Art. I, § 10
Martin v. Southern Baptist Hosp. of New Orleans 444 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
the court held that Act 808 of 1975 which added R.S.
Walsh Filter Co. v. Rice 439 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
defendants specifically claim that the allegation that the lessor “knew or should have known” of the vices and defects does not meet the test of fact pleading required under our law.
State v. Bolden 437 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Bagby v. Dillon 434 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Chalstrom v. Desselles on Behalf of Desselles 433 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
The Louisiana supreme court in Chaney ( (La.
Chaney v. State Through Dept. of Health 432 So. 2d 256 La. 1983
Ramirez v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 433 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
presented the first occasion for the Louisiana Supreme Court to decide the issue of whether the statute could be applied retroactively.
Powell v. Ferguson 429 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
addressed the issue of retroactivity of statutes as follows: “La.Civil Code art. 8 provides that ‘[a] law can prescribe only for the future; it can have no retrospective operation, ...
Procell v. Insurance Co. of North America 425 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Boudreaux v. Verret 422 So. 2d 1167 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
4th Cir.1978); Affirmed in pertinent part, Shores v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, (La.App.
Simpson v. Department of Health & Human Resources 423 So. 2d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
9:5628 because this statute did not become effective until 1975, and moreover, that this statute is not to be given retroactive effect.
Guste v. Burris 417 So. 2d 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Reichenphader v. Allstate Ins. Co. 418 So. 2d 648 La. 1982
Dominguez v. Travelers & Allstate Insurance 415 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Freeman v. Insurance Co. of North America 413 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
App. 4th Cir. 1978), affirmed in pertinent part McDonald v. Boh Bros. Construction Co., Inc., (La.
Shores v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York 413 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
4th Cir. 1978), affirmed in pertinent part (La.
Nelson v. Continental Cas. Co. 412 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
However, procedural or remedial laws cannot consistently with state and federal constitutions apply retroactively to deprive a person of a preexisting right.
Lombard v. Manchester Life Ins. Co. 406 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Tate v. Rea 405 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
: State v. Alden Mills, 202 La.
Reichenphader v. Allstate Ins. Co. 402 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Sciacca v. Polizzi 403 So. 2d 728 La. 1981
Hoefly v. Government Emp. Ins. Co. 403 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
Ewing v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 402 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
9:5628, the medical malpractice prescription statute
Wattigny v. Wattigny 402 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Green v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Mason v. Mason 399 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Louque v. Lanasa 398 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Free v. Franklin Guest Home, Inc. 397 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
Phelps v. Donaldson, 243 La.
Nugent v. Executive Officers of Harter Oil Co. 396 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
App. 4th Cir. 1978) affirmed in pertinent part
Tilley v. Government Employees Ins. Co. 396 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
9:5628, the medical malpractice prescription statute
Clements v. STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH, ETC. 391 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
[7] Lott v. Haley, La., , and cases cited therein.
Andrus v. Patton 394 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Sciacca v. Polizzi 394 So. 2d 1319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Johnson v. Fournet 387 So. 2d 1336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
our Supreme Court was confronted with the retroactive application of La.
Stipe v. Joseph A. Neyrey General Contractors, Inc. 385 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
* * * ” In further discussion of this issue, -524 (La.1979), the Supreme Court reiterated the general rule set forth in Ardoin, supra; however, the Court also said: “ * * * This jurisprudential rule is subject to the exception that procedural and remedial laws are not accorded retroactive effect where such retroactivity would operate unconstitutionally to di
Orleans Parish School Board v. Pittman Construction Co. 384 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
In Pittman II, also acting then as the organ of the court, I (1979), wherein it stated: “Nonetheless, a newly-created statute of limitation or one which shortens existing periods of limitation will not violate the constitutional prohibition against divesting a vested right provided it allows a reasonable time for those affected by the act to assert their rights.
Cordova v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 378 So. 2d 1088 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Lynch v. Foster 376 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Goad v. May 376 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Zeno v. Lincoln General Hospital 376 So. 2d 1284 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
Waggoner v. Kellogg-Moore Oil Co., Inc. 375 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
Wilson v. Cost+ Plus of Vivian, Inc. 375 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
Orleans Parish Sch. Bd. v. Pittman Const. Co., Inc. 372 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979