DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bass v. Aetna Ins. Co., 370 So. 2d 511.

20 citing documents.

  • Payne v. Hurwitz 978 So. 2d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Co., , 513 n. 1 (La.1979); and A. Brousseau & Co. v. Ship Hudson, 11 La.Ann.
  • Mosley v. TEMPLE BAPTIST CHURCH OF RUSTON 920 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • Green v. Harrah's Casino 774 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
  • Buckbee v. Aweco, Inc. 587 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • Buckbee v. United Gas Pipe Line Co. Inc. 561 So. 2d 76 La. 1990
    Co., Theunissen v. Guidry, 244 La.
  • Vantrige v. Lloyd's of Louisiana Ins. Co. 543 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc. 521 So. 2d 1123 La. 1988
    Co., Prestenbach v. Sentry Ins.
  • Williams v. American Crescent Elevator 518 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
    Co., Guillotte v. Houston General Ins.
  • Varnado v. Sanders 477 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Co., Chappuis v. Sears Roebuck & Co., Fritscher v. Chateau Golf & Country Club, (La.App.
  • Madere v. Serpas 442 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Co., stated: “Knowledge is the main stay of this assumption of the risk defense, and this court will impute knowledge to a plaintiff, not because he was in a position to make certain observations, but only when the plaintiff actually made those observations and from those observations should reasonably have known
  • Dunshee v. Comfort 441 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Co., wherein the court stated: Assumption of the risk and contributory negligence are affirmative defenses, C.C.P.
  • Guillot v. Fisherman's Paradise, Inc. 437 So. 2d 840 La. 1983
  • Sanders v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 422 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
  • Falgout v. Wardlaw 423 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
  • Mcdaniel v. Allstate Insurance 416 So. 2d 1344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Co., stated: Knowledge is the mainstay of this assumption of the risk defense, and this court will impute knowledge to a plaintiff, not because he was in a position to make certain observations, but only when the plaintiff actually made those observations and from those observations should reasonably have known
  • Carpenter v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. 411 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
  • Robillard v. P & R RACETRACKS, INC. 405 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • McCoy v. Chambers 403 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
  • Dorry v. LaFleur 399 So. 2d 559 La. 1981
    Co., we repeated: "Knowledge is the mainstay of this assumption of the risk defense, and this court will impute knowledge to a plaintiff, not because he was in a position to make certain observations, but only when the plaintiff actually made those observations and from those observations should reasonably have
  • Dorry v. LaFleur 387 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    In a recent case, the Supreme Court discussed in some detail the doctrine of assumption of risk.