Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Schexnayder v. Schexnayder, 371 So. 2d 769.

22 citing documents.

Slack v. Slack 641 So. 2d 1059 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Sambola v. Sambola 493 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
The Supreme Court of Louisiana, and in other cases, said: "Upon appellate review, the determination of the trial judge in child custody cases is entitled to great weight and will *209 not be disturbed unless a clear showing of abuse of discretion is made."
Giles v. Giles 479 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
the court held that one act of adultery or even several acts with the same paramour does not necessarily render a person morally unfit.
Cato v. Morales 446 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Stewart v. Stewart 430 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Murphy v. Murphy 427 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Distinguished Griffin v. Griffin 424 So. 2d 1228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
[2] Plaintiff-in-rule argues Mrs. Griffin's past history of living with different men makes her an unfit mother, (La.
Duplantis v. Monteaux 412 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
[3] a custody rule case wherein the mother had persisted in an open and public adulterous affair at hotels and other places, depriving the children of her care, despite community and family outrage.
Distinguished Theriot v. Huval 413 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Leckie v. Leckie 415 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
1st Cir. 1980); Fulco, supra
Bonner v. Bonner 408 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Fulco; Monsour, supra; writs denied
Stephenson v. Stephenson 404 So. 2d 963 La. 1981
Hilderbrand v. Hilderbrand 391 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
a husband was granted a divorce based on adultery but the trial court gave his wife custody of four and six year old children.
Hadley v. Hadley 394 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Manley v. Manley 389 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
This is not a where the mother, while still married, neglected the needs of her young children in order to engage in a notorious affair with her lover, himself a married man.
Fouchi v. Fouchi 391 So. 2d 1352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Bordelon v. Bordelon, supra; Cleeton v. Cleeton, supra
Kashefi v. Kashefi 393 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Mobley v. Mobley 393 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
the Court stated: “We acknowledge that the evidence indicates that the respondent did not engage in any sexual activity with her paramour in front of the children.
Howes v. Howes 388 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
(because of the extreme notoriety of the wife's sexual activities).
Johnson v. Johnson 381 So. 2d 1317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
1122 , (1971) that the criterion for the change of custody is a finding that the mother is unfit and that the children’s continued presence in the environment provided by the mother is so detrimental to the children as to justify removing them from the environment to which they have become accustomed.
Dickey v. Dickey 383 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Shanklin v. Shanklin 376 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979