Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., 371 So. 2d 1146.

333 citing documents.

  • Johnson v. Ins. Co. of N. America 454 So. 2d 1113 La. 1984
    Robertson v. Scanio Produce and Institutional Foods, Inc., West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc.
  • Conrad v. Jack Donahue Contractors, Inc. 450 So. 2d 1035 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc.
  • Schwendinger v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 451 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    ” West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., at 1147 (La.1979) In the case before the court, the trial judge was better situated to evaluate the contradictions in testimony and the veracity and demeanor of the witnesses.
  • Fagan v. Delta Steel & Construction Co. 449 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc.
  • Robertson v. Scanio Produce 449 So. 2d 459 La. 1984
    West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc.
  • Thomas v. RPM CORP. 449 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc.
  • Karam v. Ashworth 445 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    The Supreme Court set forth the applicable legal principles governing the burden of proof necessary to establish a work-related injury in West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., as follows: In a workman’s compensation suit, the employee must establish the work-accident causing the injury by a preponderance of the evidence — i.e., ‘the testimony, as a whole, must show that more probably than (not) the employment accident caused the disability.’ Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc.
  • Lennix v. St. Charles Grain Elevator Co. 439 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
    West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc.
  • Ebey v. Dolphin Const. Co. 435 So. 2d 1154 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    ERRORS NO. 1 AND 2 The defendants argue that the plaintiff failed to meet his burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that he suffered a disability caused by a work-related accident, citing as authority West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., and Vallot v. Andrus Homes, Inc., (La.App.
  • Perry v. Hotard's Plumbing 436 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc.
  • Culp v. Belden Corp. 432 So. 2d 847 La. 1983
    See, e.g., West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., in which a forty-eight year old nurse's aide with a fourth grade education and able to do only manual labor was found to be totally and permanently disabled by the trial court after she injured her back while trying to lift a patient; and Walker v. Gaines P. Wilson & Son, Inc., wh
  • Pendleton v. Spartan Bldg. Const. 432 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
    See, West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., (La.
  • Lewis v. Rapides Parish School Board 430 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    3rd Cir. 1981), quoting West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc.
  • Gardner v. Brown 428 So. 2d 1304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc.
  • Oalmann v. Brock and Blevins Co., Inc. 428 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    The Louisiana Supreme Court has set forth the applicable legal principles governing the burden of proof necessary to establish a work-related injury in West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., as follows: In a workman's compensation suit, the employee must establish the work-accident causing the injury by a preponderance of the evidence—i.e., "the testimony, as a whole, must show that more probably than [not] the employment accident caused the disability."
  • Alexander v. Leger 423 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., and cases cited therein.
  • Vallot v. Andrus Homes, Inc. 425 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    The legal principles governing the burden of proof necessary to establish a work-related injury were set forth in the case of West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., as follows: “In a workmen’s compensation suit, the employee must establish the work-accident causing the injury by a preponderance of the evidence, i.e., ‘the testimony, as a whole, must show that more probably than [not] the employment accident caused the disability.’ Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co.
  • Daney v. Argonaut Ins. Co. 421 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., (La.App.
  • McCoy v. Franklin Parish Police Jury 414 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
    1979); and West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc.
  • Crockett v. St. Paul Ins. Co. 413 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    See West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc.
  • Staten v. Security Industrial Ins. Co. 414 So. 2d 1328 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
    See Arceneaux v. Domingue, *1333 and West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc.
  • Breaux v. Allstate Insurance 411 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    The Supreme Court set forth the applicable legal principles governing the burden of proof necessary to establish the work-related injury in West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., as follows: “In a workman’s compensation suit, the employee must establish the work-accident causing the injury by a preponderance of the evidence — i.e., “the testimony, as a whole, must show that more probably than [not] the employment accident caused the disability.” Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc.
  • Poland v. American Mutual Insurance 409 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc.
  • Crochet v. American Tobacco Co. 407 So. 2d 1330 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    In West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., our Supreme Court stated: "...
  • Juneau v. Garan, Inc. 399 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    The Supreme Court set forth the applicable legal principles governing the burden of proof necessary to establish a work-related injury in West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., as follows: “In a workman’s compensation suit, the employee must establish the work-accident causing the injury by a preponderance of the evidence — i. e., ‘the testimony, as a whole, must show that more probably than [not] the employment accident caused the disability.’ Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc
  • Jones v. Alexander 399 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
    In determining whether the claimant has discharged his burden of proof, the Louisiana Supreme Court in West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., (La.
  • Fish v. Commercial Union Assurance Co. 398 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    ..” West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., (La.
  • Billiot v. Alton's Bakery of Morgan City, Inc. 398 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., Gurry v. Allied Metals, Inc., (La.
  • Hall v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. 390 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
    In determining whether the claimant has discharged his burden of proof, the Louisiana Supreme Court in West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., held: "...
  • Whitaker v. Church's Fried Chicken, Inc. 387 So. 2d 1093 La. 1980
    See West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc.
  • Latin v. Hica Corp. 384 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    See West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc.
  • Charleston v. Nabors Trailers, Inc. 381 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
    In West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., (La.
  • Hand v. Reeves 378 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
    West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc.