Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Baten v. Taylor, 386 So. 2d 333.

30 citing documents.

Windward Land, LLC and Michael Morris Gulley versus Mary Lee Mann and William Lamont Frazier, Alvin Edwards and … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
App. 3 Cir. 1962) (citing Tulane, supra, with approval);14 (La.
Succession of Cladie J. Wade La. 2025
In re Laborde 251 So. 3d 461 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
7/1/08), , 55 ; Baten v. Taylor , , 339 (La.
Matthews v. Horrell 977 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Alice Landry Boyer and Cheryl Landry Kokkinis v. Stric-Lan Companies Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Boyer v. STRIC-LAN COMPANIES CORP. 888 So. 2d 1037 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Succession of Stewart v. Succession of Turner 818 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Citing that student comment, states that the practical effect of La.
Horrell v. Horrell 808 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
In Re Succession of Jackson 770 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Succession of Mott 715 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Succession of Stoufflet 665 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Succession of Mydland 653 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
See also id., § 3295, p. 602, on double conditional dispositions (): "If the testators have such an easy means to make two successive valid dispositions, which differ from a substitution only in form and classification, why do the courts not read this concept into wills, where the testator has omitted to use such a technique because of ignorance of legal subtleties?
Jones v. McDonald's Corporation 618 So. 2d 992 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Houma Mortgage & Loan, (La.App.
HOUMA MORTG. & LOAN, INC. v. Stoufflet 602 So. 2d 1147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Allen v. Louisiana State Bd. of Dentistry 603 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Succession of Russell 590 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Succession of LeRuth 569 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
Civil Code Articles 940, [5] *558 941, [6] 945, [7]
Collins v. Baggette 549 So. 2d 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Simpson v. Colvin, supra, and Fortson v. Lake, Inc., (La.App.
Newsom v. Boothe 524 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Succession of Payne 524 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
A as having three elements: "(1) A double liberality, or a double disposition in full ownership, of the same thing to persons called to receive it, one after the other; "(2) Charge to preserve and transmit, imposed on the first beneficiary for the benefit of the second beneficiary; "(3) Establishment of a suc
Launey v. Barrouse 509 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Succession of Kolbe 499 So. 2d 1154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
McKeithen v. Hogan 485 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Succession of Moran 479 So. 2d 350 La. 1985
Report by the Louisiana State Law Institute to Accompany the Proposed Louisiana Trust Code, Vol.
Cahn v. Cahn 468 So. 2d 1176 La. 1985
Civil Code articles 870, 871, 940, 941, 942, 1626
Succession of Moran 466 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Succession of Goode 425 So. 2d 673 La. 1982
Mingledorff v. American Bank and Trust Co. 420 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Turning next to the question of the effect of Mrs. Mingledorff's (Weaks) judicial mortgage on the fund, the Louisiana Supreme Court recently explained that both seizin and ownership, though different, flow to the heir at the time of death, (La.
Smith v. Stephens 401 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
our Supreme Court held that seizin is not ownership.
Succession of Goode 395 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981