Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Touchet v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark, NJ, 146 So. 2d 441.

24 citing documents.

  • Iberia Sav. & Loan Assn. v. Warren 569 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
  • Louisiana Bank & Trust Co. v. Roanoke Rice Co-op 247 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    4th Cir., 1966), Touchet v. Fireman’s Insurance *634 Company, (La.App.
  • Snipes v. Southern Baptist Hospital 243 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
  • Johnson v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. 241 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    Touchet v. Fireman’s Insurance Co., La.App., .
  • Joiner v. Lenee 213 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
    966 and 967; Duplechain v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, Touchet v. Firemen's Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, (La.App.3d Cir. 1962, cert.
  • Frank v. Great American Insurance Company 196 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
    In the case of Touchet v. Firemen's Insurance Company of Newark, N. J., La.App., (3rd Cir. 1962, certiorari denied) the precise question presented here was not at issue, but, in discussing the motion for summary judgment generally, we stated: "Vol.
  • Burrus v. Guest House of Opelousas, Inc. 195 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Touchet v. Firemen’s Insurance Co. of Newark, N. J., La.App., .
  • Banes v. Prinz 185 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
  • Prentice v. Amax Petroleum Corp. 187 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    1962) ; Gym Master Company v. Pool (La.App.
  • O. L. Sims Co. of Louisiana v. International Engineers, Inc. 181 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    1095 , ; Wilkinson v. Husser (1963) La.App., ; Touchet v. Firemen’s Insurance Co. of Newark, N. J. (1962) La.App., ; Gym Master Company v. Pool (1963) La.App., 157 So,2d 738, and the authorities therein cited.
  • Smooth v. Ethyl Corp. 179 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
  • Cheramie v. Louisiana Power & Light Company 176 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
    * * * * * * "Our brothers in the third circuit, considering this new procedural device in Touchet v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark, N. J., La.App., , relying upon sources interpretative of the Federal Procedure, in our opinion, very appropriately remarked: "`We have as yet developed very little jurisprudence in Louisiana on summary judgments because this procedural device did not become a part of our law until the effective date of the Code of Civil Procedure on
  • Brown v. B & G Crane Service, Inc. 172 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
    3rd Cir. 1962); Touchet v. Fireman's Insurance Co. of Newark, N. J., (La.App.
  • Manuel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 166 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
  • Richie v. Chaudoir 163 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
  • Touchet v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark, NJ 159 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
  • Gym Master Co. v. Pool 157 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    3 Cir. 1962), ; Walmsley v. Gilmore (La.App.
  • Duplechain v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 155 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    3 Cir., , we held that for the purposes of considering a motion for summary judgment, the court is not bound to accept as true the allegations contained in plaintiff's petition.
  • Wilkinson v. Husser 154 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Our brothers in the third circuit, considering this new procedural device in Touchet v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark, N. J., La.App., , relying upon sources interpretative of the Federal Procedure, in our opinion, very appropriately remarked: "We have as yet developed very little jurisprudence in Louisiana on summary judgments because this procedural device did not become a part of our law until the effective date of the Code of Civil Procedure on J
  • Ellis v. Johnson Lumber Company 150 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    * * *'" See also Touchet v. Firemen's Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, (3rd Cir. La.App.); (3rd Cir. La.App.); (4th Cir. La.App.); (4th Cir. La.App.); Snell v. Intercoastal Airways, Inc., 139 So.
  • Dowden v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company 151 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    This court has already held in Touchet v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark, New Jersey., La.App., , that the court need not necessarily accept as true the allegations of plaintiff's petition, for purposes of deciding a motion for summary judgment, where the evidence at the hearing shows that the allegations are frivolous and have no evidentiary support.
  • Vallier v. Aetna Finance Company 152 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
  • Freyou v. Marquette Casualty Company 149 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    L.S.A.-CCP Art. 966; Touchet v. Firemen's Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, (3rd Cir.La.
  • McDonald v. Grande Corporation 148 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
    3 Cir., ; Walmsley v. Gilmore, La.App.