Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Touchet v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark, NJ, 146 So. 2d 441.
- Iberia Sav. & Loan Assn. v. Warren 569 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
-
Louisiana Bank & Trust Co. v. Roanoke Rice Co-op
247 So. 2d 632
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
4th Cir., 1966), Touchet v. Fireman’s Insurance *634 Company, (La.App.
- Snipes v. Southern Baptist Hospital 243 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
-
Johnson v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.
241 So. 2d 23
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Touchet v. Fireman’s Insurance Co., La.App., .
-
Joiner v. Lenee
213 So. 2d 136
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
966 and 967; Duplechain v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, Touchet v. Firemen's Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, (La.App.3d Cir. 1962, cert.
-
Frank v. Great American Insurance Company
196 So. 2d 50
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
In the case of Touchet v. Firemen's Insurance Company of Newark, N. J., La.App., (3rd Cir. 1962, certiorari denied) the precise question presented here was not at issue, but, in discussing the motion for summary judgment generally, we stated: "Vol.
-
Burrus v. Guest House of Opelousas, Inc.
195 So. 2d 173
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Touchet v. Firemen’s Insurance Co. of Newark, N. J., La.App., .
- Banes v. Prinz 185 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
-
Prentice v. Amax Petroleum Corp.
187 So. 2d 752
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
1962) ; Gym Master Company v. Pool (La.App.
-
O. L. Sims Co. of Louisiana v. International Engineers, Inc.
181 So. 2d 436
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
1095 , ; Wilkinson v. Husser (1963) La.App., ; Touchet v. Firemen’s Insurance Co. of Newark, N. J. (1962) La.App., ; Gym Master Company v. Pool (1963) La.App., 157 So,2d 738, and the authorities therein cited.
- Smooth v. Ethyl Corp. 179 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
-
Cheramie v. Louisiana Power & Light Company
176 So. 2d 209
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
* * * * * * "Our brothers in the third circuit, considering this new procedural device in Touchet v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark, N. J., La.App., , relying upon sources interpretative of the Federal Procedure, in our opinion, very appropriately remarked: "`We have as yet developed very little jurisprudence in Louisiana on summary judgments because this procedural device did not become a part of our law until the effective date of the Code of Civil Procedure on
-
Brown v. B & G Crane Service, Inc.
172 So. 2d 708
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
3rd Cir. 1962); Touchet v. Fireman's Insurance Co. of Newark, N. J., (La.App.
- Manuel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 166 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
- Richie v. Chaudoir 163 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
- Touchet v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark, NJ 159 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
-
Gym Master Co. v. Pool
157 So. 2d 738
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
3 Cir. 1962), ; Walmsley v. Gilmore (La.App.
-
Duplechain v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.
155 So. 2d 459
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
3 Cir., , we held that for the purposes of considering a motion for summary judgment, the court is not bound to accept as true the allegations contained in plaintiff's petition.
-
Wilkinson v. Husser
154 So. 2d 490
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Our brothers in the third circuit, considering this new procedural device in Touchet v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark, N. J., La.App., , relying upon sources interpretative of the Federal Procedure, in our opinion, very appropriately remarked: "We have as yet developed very little jurisprudence in Louisiana on summary judgments because this procedural device did not become a part of our law until the effective date of the Code of Civil Procedure on J
-
Ellis v. Johnson Lumber Company
150 So. 2d 838
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
* * *'" See also Touchet v. Firemen's Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, (3rd Cir. La.App.); (3rd Cir. La.App.); (4th Cir. La.App.); (4th Cir. La.App.); Snell v. Intercoastal Airways, Inc., 139 So.
-
Dowden v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
151 So. 2d 697
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
This court has already held in Touchet v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark, New Jersey., La.App., , that the court need not necessarily accept as true the allegations of plaintiff's petition, for purposes of deciding a motion for summary judgment, where the evidence at the hearing shows that the allegations are frivolous and have no evidentiary support.
- Vallier v. Aetna Finance Company 152 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
-
Freyou v. Marquette Casualty Company
149 So. 2d 697
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
L.S.A.-CCP Art. 966; Touchet v. Firemen's Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, (3rd Cir.La.
-
McDonald v. Grande Corporation
148 So. 2d 441
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
3 Cir., ; Walmsley v. Gilmore, La.App.