Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Kimble, 375 So. 2d 924.
- State of Louisiana Versus Alexsy Mejia La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
- State of Louisiana Versus Sherneskie Bell La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
- State v. Randolph 219 So. 3d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- State v. Griffin 176 So. 3d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
-
State v. Castillo
167 So. 3d 624
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court found that the State could not be charged with testimony elicited by defense counsel implying that the defendant had previously committed other crimes and that the defendant could not claim reversible error on the basis of that evidence which was elicited.
-
State v. Melancon
151 So. 3d 100
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
the Louisiana Supreme Court held that “the state cannot be charged with testimony elicited by defense counsel implying that defendant had previously committed other crimes and that defendant cannot claim reversible error on the basis of that evidence which is elicited.” This holding was reiterated by t
-
State v. Augustine
125 So. 3d 1203
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
the Supreme Court held that “the state cannot be charged with testimony elicited by defense counsel implying that defendant had previously committed other crimes and that defendant cannot claim reversible error on the basis of that evidence which is elicited.” This holding was reiterated by the Court in Sta
- State v. Chisolm 74 So. 3d 242 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
- State v. Russell 73 So. 3d 991 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
-
State v. Smith
983 So. 2d 65
La. 2008
See United States v. Hamilton, 931 F.2d 1046, 1051 (5th Cir.1991); (La.
-
State v. McFarland
960 So. 2d 1142
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
See, State v. Ortiz, 701 So.2d at 931
- State v. Johnson 951 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
-
State v. Fielding
862 So. 2d 420
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
the supreme court held that two defendants had no right to an expectation of privacy beneath the steps of a vacant trailer where they had hidden drugs.
-
State v. Nightengale
818 So. 2d 819
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
the defendant moved for discovery of statements made by Miller, a co-participant in the offense who was never charged but with whom defendant had been incarcerated in a Mississippi county jail.
-
State v. Lincoln
794 So. 2d 56
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
(Citation omitted); (La.App.
- State v. Raborn 771 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
-
State v. Brumfield
737 So. 2d 660
La. 1998
(uncharged co-participant not a codefendant for purposes of Article 722); (La.App.
- State v. Ortiz 701 So. 2d 922 La. 1997
-
State v. Campbell
640 So. 2d 622
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
the Louisiana Supreme Court found that a defendant who had hidden drugs underneath the vacant trailer next door to his own trailer had no reasonable privacy interest in the vacant trailer next door when it stated: "Kimble and Spruell had no right to an expectation of privacy beneath the steps of the vacan
- State v. Abrams 527 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. Billiot 521 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
- State v. Landry 502 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
- State v. Serigny 481 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- State v. Marshall 479 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
-
State v. Taylor
468 So. 2d 617
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
353 So.2d at 1305 See also, State v. Bennett, supra; (La.App.
- State v. Miles 464 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
- State v. Gordon 464 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- State v. Holmes 451 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Henry 440 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
- State v. Tribbet 415 So. 2d 182 La. 1982
- State v. Talbot 408 So. 2d 861 La. 1981
-
State v. Meredith
403 So. 2d 712
La. 1981
15:455; there is no evidence of the essential elements of intent and unauthorized entry by the defendant.
- State v. Jackson 396 So. 2d 1291 La. 1981
- State v. Norwood 396 So. 2d 1307 La. 1981
- State v. James 396 So. 2d 1281 La. 1981
- State v. Knowles 392 So. 2d 651 La. 1980
-
State v. Eaker
380 So. 2d 19
La. 1980
[4] defendant moved for discovery of statements made by Miller, a co-participant in the offense who was never charged but with whom defendant had been incarcerated in a Mississippi county jail.