Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co., 373 So. 2d 488.

88 citing documents.

O'NEAL v. Jackson Parish Police Jury 658 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
See and compare Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co., (La.App.
City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rs 640 So. 2d 237 La. 1994
2nd Cir.1978) rev'd on other grounds, (1979); (La.App.
Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. v. STEIMLE & ASSOC., INC. 620 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
See Smith v. W. Virginia Oil & Gas Co., Frommeyer v. St.
Mendoza v. Brown 618 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
); Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Company
Pipe Liners, Inc. v. Edenwald Contracting Co. 610 So. 2d 1109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
See Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co., *1114 (La.1979); Schwegmann Bros. G.S.
Ouachita Parish Police Jury v. AM. WASTE AND POLLUTION CONTROL CO. 606 So. 2d 1341 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co.
Hobbs v. Gorman 595 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
2d Cir.1978), rev'd on other grounds, (La.
Abadie v. Bolton 581 So. 2d 657 La. 1991
See Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co., Equitable Petroleum v. Central Transmission, Inc., (La.App.
Bayou Hunting Club of Hunter v. DeSoto Parish Police Jury 569 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co., (La.App.
South Cent. Bell Telephone Co. v. PSC 555 So. 2d 1370 La. 1990
Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co., J. Friedenthal, M. Kane & A. Miller, Civil Procedure § 15.4 at 702 (1985).
Adams v. Evans 556 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
In Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co., the Supreme Court stated: “A preliminary injunction is a procedural device interlocutory in nature designed to preserve the existing status pending a trial of the issues on the merits of the case.” [See] LSA-C.C.P.
Davis v. Henry 555 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
2d Cir.1978), reversed on other grounds
Petroleum Treaters Inc. v. Houma Land & Offshore Co. 545 So. 2d 1300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co., (La.
New Orleans Pub. Serv. Inc. v. City Council of New Orleans 539 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
2d Cir.1978), rev'd on other grounds
Myers v. City of Lafayette 537 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co.
Transworld Drilling v. Tex. Gen. Petro. 517 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Company
Hairford v. Perkins 520 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co., (La.App.
Noble v. Ritterbush 514 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
In opposition to the motion to dismiss, defendant claims that in a preliminary injunction the status quo is maintained, Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co., and because he was ordered to perform an act, i.e., the return of the files to plaintiff, the judgment was in the nature of a permanent injunction.
Ormond Country Club v. Dorvin Developments, Inc. 498 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co., (La.
Glass v. Wiltz 483 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Werner Enterprises, Inc. v. Westend Development Co. 477 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
5th Cir.1983), quoting Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co., writ denied, cert.
Posey v. Smith 453 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co.
Federal Nat. Mortg. Ass'n v. O'DONNELL 446 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co., and cases cited therein.
Frommeyer v. St. Charles Parish 444 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Smith v. W. Virginia Oil & Gas Co.
Freeman v. Treen 442 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
art. 3601; Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co.
Adcock v. Marshall Exploration, Inc. 434 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co., Poole v. Guste, 261 La.
Equitable Petroleum v. Cent. Transmission 431 So. 2d 1084 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co.
Cox v. Champagne 430 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
See Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co., (La.
Daiquiri Factory, Ltd. v. City of Lafayette 429 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
2nd Cir.1978), reversed on other grounds
Matter of Kenilworth Ins. Co. 428 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co., (La.
Huber Oil Co. of Louisiana, Inc. v. Save-Time 422 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
While we recognize that a suit for preliminary injunction is not controlling on the merits of the principal demand, Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Company, the plaintiff has shown no contractual rights against these defendants.
Hays v. City of Baton Rouge 421 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co., Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Inc., supra.
Guidry v. Primeaux 410 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Article 3601; Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co., Lamb v. Quality Inspection Services, Inc., (La.App.
CCH, INC. v. Heard 410 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
2 Cir. 1978), reversed on other grounds and the comment under the above section of the Louisiana Mineral Code.
Lamb v. Quality Inspection Services, Inc. 398 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co., (La.
Colvin v. Bennett 395 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Moorhead v. State, Department of Highways, and Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co.
Richland Parish Bus Drivers Ass'n v. Richland Parish School Board 393 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
As pointed out in Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co., page 494: “...
David v. Dixie Rice Agricultural Corp. 379 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co., (La.App.