DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Thrasher v. Leggett, 373 So. 2d 494.

50 citing documents.

  • Zachary Zaunbrecher v. Marissa Martin, Jeremy Ponthieux, and Nathan Ponthier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    9:2800.1 reasoning of Thrasher v. Leggett[, ]
  • Zaunbrecher ex rel. Father v. Martin 242 So. 3d 712 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    9:2800.1 reasoning of Thrasher v. Leggett [, ]
  • Morris v. Bulldog BR, LLC 147 So. 3d 1122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • Bishop v. Clicks Baton Rouge, Inc. 112 So. 3d 852 La. 2013
  • Christine M. Comeaux v. Debbie Lemmons La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    The result in Bertrand was based upon our supreme court’s and Sanders v. Hercules Sheet Metal, Inc.
  • Aucoin v. Rochel 5 So. 3d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    superseded by statute as stated in Godfrey v. Boston Old Colony Ins.
  • Keith Roy v. Kyrles, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    The result in Bertrand was based upon our supreme court’s and Sanders v. Hercules Sheet Metal, Inc
  • Roy v. Kyrles, Inc. 983 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    and Sanders v. Hercules Sheet Metal, Inc.
  • Crutchfield v. Landry 870 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    It stated that: The “affirmative act” requirement, specifically unreasonable ejectment from the premises, was put into place by this Court in Thrasher[ v. Leggett, ], as a requirement to impose liability on an alcoholic beverage vendor who serves alcohol to an intoxicated adult.
  • Berg v. Zummo 786 So. 2d 708 La. 2001
  • Followed Wicker v. Harmony Corp. 784 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    982 , (1966), overruled on other grounds, overruled
  • Phipps v. Bruno Const. 773 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
  • Berg v. Zummo 763 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    (applying same rule to sales of alcohol to persons of legal drinking age).
  • Robertson v. State 747 So. 2d 1276 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Nevertheless, the court denied the bar owner's liability and overruled the trial court's judgment for the plaintiff explaining the limited scope of the Pence ruling as follows: On the other hand our decision in Pence was correct in finding that Article 2315 imposes upon a bar owner a duty to avoid affirmative acts which
  • Vallier v. Louisiana Health Systems, Inc. 722 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    3 Cir.1982), overruled in part on other grounds, (La.
  • Godfrey v. Boston Old Colony Ins. Co. 718 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    Three years after Pence was decided on a pre-trial motion in 1976, refused to impose liability on a vendor of alcoholic beverages for injuries received by a patron who was escorted from the premises by the defendant's employee, despite the fact the vendor violated a law prohibiting the serving of alcohol to a highly intoxicated person.
  • Robinson v. Dunn 683 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • Schulker v. Roberson 676 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    9:2800.1 represents the legislative enactment of the Louisiana Supreme Court’s
  • Schulker v. Roberson 676 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • Perry v. First National Bank of Jefferson 673 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    Darville v. Texaco, Inc., Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. England, 252 La.
  • Spears v. Bradford 652 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • Spears v. Bradford 652 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • Vaughan v. Hair 645 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rs 640 So. 2d 237 La. 1994
    1984); Darville v. Texaco, Inc., Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. England, 252 La.
  • Bourgeois v. Puglisi 615 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • Mills v. Harris 615 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    the Louisiana Supreme Court defined the duty owed by a provider of alcoholic beverages.
  • Clair v. Paris Road Drugs, Inc. 573 So. 2d 1219 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
    9:2800.1 declaring that, "...
  • Edson v. Walker 573 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • Boudreaux v. Delchamps, Inc. 567 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    defines the duty imposed upon the providers of alcohol under La.C.C.
  • Bertrand v. Kratzer's Country Mart 563 So. 2d 1302 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    the Louisiana Supreme Court defined the duty owed by a provider of alcoholic beverages.
  • Freeman v. Estate of Young 552 So. 2d 1285 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
    9:2800.1(A) should be given retroactive application on the basis that it is interpretive and merely codifies the prior Louisiana Supreme Court holdings of Sanders v. Hercules Sheet Metal, Inc., (La.
  • Pitts v. Bailes 551 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    a case in which an intoxicated patron sued a bar owner for damages he received in a fall on the premises, that an alcoholic beverage retailer is not absolutely liable for the consequences of a patron's intoxication.
  • Loeffler v. Sal & Sam's Restaurant 541 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    See Sanders v. Hercules Sheet Metal, Inc., -76 (La.1980), (emphasis added).
  • Gresham v. Davenport 537 So. 2d 1144 La. 1989
  • Gregor v. Constitution State Ins. Co. 534 So. 2d 1340 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    the Louisiana Supreme Court examined La.R.S.
  • Enterprise Transp. Co. v. Veals 532 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    The court stated: we examined the duty owed by a bar owner to an intoxicated patron.
  • Dickerson v. Boom, Inc. 532 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    982 , (1966); (1976), (1979).
  • Stephens v. Pacific Employers Ins. Co. 525 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • Brown v. Wolfe 525 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Sanders, 385 So.2d at 776
  • LeBlanc v. Adams 510 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
    Pretermitting the fundamental issue of whether Commander's Palace may be deemed to have provided alcohol to Dyane Adams, we note that Commander's Palace, Inc., and Sanders v. Hercules Sheet Metal, Inc.
  • Robinson v. Hardy 505 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • Eldridge v. Downtowner Hotel 492 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    App. 4th Cir.1981), writ denied, (defendant was liable for wrongful death of insane victim who was incapable of appreciating risk of backing truck); overruled in part, (recognized the duty of a bar owner to avoid affirmative acts which increase the peril to an intoxicated patron).
  • Argus v. Scheppegrell 459 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • Garcia on Behalf of Garcia v. Jennings 427 So. 2d 1329 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • Buxton v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. 422 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    overruled in part, Eschete v. City of New Orleans, 258 La.
  • Chausse v. Southland Corp. 400 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • Canty v. Terrebonne Parish Police Jury 397 So. 2d 1370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Although the result in Pence has been seriously questioned, the court's statement of what constitutes negligent conduct remains the law.
  • Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc. 392 So. 2d 398 La. 1980
    712 , overruled on other grounds
  • Sanders v. Hercules Sheet Metal, Inc. 385 So. 2d 772 La. 1980
  • Nichols v. Hodges 385 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980