Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lytell v. Strickland Transp. Co., Inc., 373 So. 2d 138.

18 citing documents.

Homer Landry v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Landry v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. 165 So. 3d 1269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Dyke v. Time Warner Cable 961 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Co., Inc., Duncan v. State, Dep’t of Transp.
Mason v. C C C Express, Inc. 754 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
2d Cir.1981); see also Lytell v. Strickland Transportation Company, Inc., Crawford v. T. Smith & Sons, Inc., 183 La.
Jones v. Evangeline of Natchitoches, Inc. 704 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
We find the case sub judice more analogous to the case in Lytell v. Strickland Transportation Co., Inc., wherein our supreme court made the following point very clear: The statutory penalty was not intended to permit an employer-who has previously willfully refused to pay compensation awarded by an executory judgment, despite demand, for at least six successive weeks-so to escape the penalty’s application
Briscoe v. Jerry's Furniture Mart, Inc. 676 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Eglin v. United Gas Pipeline 670 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Hayes v. Louisiana Risk Management 635 So. 2d 591 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Duncan v. State, Dept. of Transp. and Development 615 So. 2d 305 La. 1993
Barnes v. LM Massey, Inc. 612 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
See Lytell v. Strickland Transportation Company, Inc.
Duncan v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 604 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Our interpretation of the statute and the Supreme Court’s ruling in Lytell v. Strickland Transportation Company, Inc., leads us to decide LSA-R.S.
Ross v. Highlands Ins. Co. 590 So. 2d 1177 La. 1991
this Court held that the Worker's Compensation Act "provides a penalty against the recalcitrant employer for non-payment of the executory judgment against him."
Hebert v. Big Chief Truck Lines, Inc. 484 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
See Lytell v. Strickland Transportation Company, Inc., (La.App.
Lofton v. Louisiana Pacific Corp. 423 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
We are well aware of the holding of Lytell v. Strickland Transportation Co., Inc., that the possibility "that the judgment might be subject to modification under Section 1331 (i.e., if the disability lessens) is not, under the statutory scheme, relevant to the availability of the penalty provided by the succeeding Section 1333."
Johnson v. Continental Ins. Cos. 410 So. 2d 1058 La. 1982
The only case in which this court has awarded a
Johnson v. Continental Insurance 396 So. 2d 2 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
pay six successive installments as they become due, the installments not yet payable under the judgment shall immediately become due and exigible and the judgment shall become executory for the whole amount; but if the employee or his dependant is adequately protected by insurance and receives payments thereunder this right shall not accrue.” In Lytell v. Strickland Transportation Company, Inc., the court stated that La.R.S.
Harris v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. 395 So. 2d 856 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
See Lytell v. Strickland Transportation Company, Inc., Crawford v. T. Smith & Son, Inc., 183 La.
Cole v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 389 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
We believe the recent decision of our Supreme Court in Lytell v. Strickland Transportation Company, Inc., to be dispositive of this issue.