Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rue v. State, Dept. of Highways, 372 So. 2d 1197.

130 citing documents.

Roger Vestal v. Cynthia D. Kirkland La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Co., 3 Rue v. State, Dep’t. of Highways
Vestal v. Kirkland 81 So. 3d 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Co., Rue v. State, Dep’t. of Highways
Brooks v. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation & Development 74 So. 3d 187 La. 2011
Co., Rue v. State, Dept. of Highways
Tonya Lynn Boudreaux v. R. E. Heidt Construction Co., Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Rue v. State, Dept. Of Highways, (La.
Clarkston v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 989 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Rue v. State, Dept. of Highways
Clarkston v. LA. FARM BUREAU CAS. INS. CO. 989 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Rue v. State, Dept. of Highways
Everhardt v. LOUISIANA DOTD 978 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Co., Rue v. State, Dept. of Highways
Granda v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. 935 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Graves v. Page, 96-2201 (La.11/7/97), ; Rue v. State, Department of Highways
Joseph S. Provost, Jr. and Joanna D. Provost v. USA Truck, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
In Rue v. State, Department of Highways, the supreme court allowed an inadvertent motorist to recover damages for her injuries when she drove onto a substandard shoulder.
Provost v. USA Truck, Inc. 901 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
In Rue v. State, Department of Highways, the supreme court allowed an inadvertent motorist to recover damages for her injuries when she drove onto a substandard shoulder.
Rathey v. Priority EMS, Inc. 894 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
In Rue v. State Department of Highways , the Louisiana Supreme Court determined that a "motorist has a right to assume" that a highway is in a "reasonably safe condition."
Distinguished Woods v. STATE, DOTD 852 So. 2d 1109 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
In Rue v. State, DOTD, the plaintiff left the road for no apparent reason and drove onto the shoulder, where she struck a rut in the shoulder (admitted by DOTD to be dangerous), and lost control *1122 of her car.
Johnson Ex Rel. Johnson v. Dumas 811 So. 2d 1085 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
Rue v. State, Dept. of Highways
Bozeman v. State 787 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Rue v. State, Department of Highways, Hood, supra .
Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern RR 786 So. 2d 682 La. 2001
Graves v. Page, 96-2201 (La.11/7/97), ; Rue v. State, Dep't of Highways
Ditch v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 745 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Rue v. State, Dept. of Highways
Netecke v. State Ex Rel. DOTD 747 So. 2d 489 La. 1999
Graves v. Page, 96-2201 (La.11/7/97), ; Rue v. State, Dep't of Highways
Cormier v. Comeaux 748 So. 2d 1123 La. 1999
Brown, supra ; Myers, supra ; Rue v. State, Dept. of Highways
Ledoux v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 719 So. 2d 43 La. 1998
Co., Rue v. State, Dep’t of Highways
Caruthers v. State 711 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Tassin, 692 So.2d at 606 , citing Rue v. State, Dept. of Highways
Brown v. Louisiana Indem. Co. 707 So. 2d 1240 La. 1998
Co., Rue v. State, Dep't of Highways
Morehead v. Ford Motor Co. 694 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
in support of their position that Mr. Morehead's actions which caused the truck to veer onto the shoulder of the road are not, by themselves, negligent.
Tassin v. State Farm Ins. Co. 692 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
1977); Payne v. Louisiana Dept. of Transp., Etc., (La.App.
Badeaux v. STATE, DOTD 690 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Rue v. State, Department of Highways
Sumner v. Sumner 664 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
In Rue v. State, Dept. Of Highways, (reversing this and the *724 trial court), where the errant driver was presented with "no real or imagined emergency situation," the Supreme Court had this to say: "A motorist has a right to assume that a highway shoulder, the function of which is to accommodate motor vehicles intentionally or unintentionall
Campbell v. DEPTARTMENT OF TRANSP. & DEV. 648 So. 2d 898 La. 1995
Rue v. State, Dept. of Highways
Bernard v. STATE, THROUGH DOTD 640 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
In Rue v. State, Dept. of Highways, the Supreme Court found that a motorist who inadvertently drove off the highway onto its shoulder and who lost control of her vehicle upon striking an admittedly dangerous rut in the shoulder was not barred from recovery for her injuries by her negligence in leaving the paved surface of the highway.
Green v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development 635 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Rue v. State, Department of Highways, LeBlanc v. State, supra.
Begnaud v. Dept. of Transp. & Dev. 631 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Rue v. State, Department of Highways
Coley v. State, Through DOTD 621 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Rue v. State, Dept. of Highways
Smith v. City of New Orleans 616 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
See, i.e.: Sinitiere v. Lavergne, supra ; Rochelle v. State Through Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development, writ denied
Brown v. Department of Transp. 604 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Rue v. State, Department of Highways, ...
Hood v. State Through DOTD 587 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Rue v. State, Department of Highways
Roberts v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. 576 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Rue v. State, Department of Highways, (La.
Roberts v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 576 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Rue v. State, Department of Highways
Chuter v. Department of Highways 575 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Galliano v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 572 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Rue v. State, Department of Highways, (La.App.
Rochelle v. STATE, DOTD 570 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
The court in Rue v. State, Department of Highways, stated that a motorist's duty to drive reasonably does not extend to the risk of injury from striking an unexpected and unexpectable hazard resulting from a negligently maintained highway shoulder.
Holloway ex rel. Holloway v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 562 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
1st Cir.1984) writ den., Rue v. State, Through the Department of Highways
L & R LEASING CO. v. Allstate Ins. Co. 561 So. 2d 1011 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
1977); or who drove onto the shoulder inadvertently where there was neither knowledge nor reason to know of a defective condition that would make such action hazardous, Rue v. State, Department of Highways
Campo v. Louisiana Power and Light Co. 560 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
In Sinitiere, supra ; Rue v. State, Dept. of Highways, (La.
Holloway v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 549 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
3d Cir.1986) citing Rue v. State, Department of Highways
Richard v. Church Insurance Co. 538 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Plaintiff concedes that she was negligent but argues that she is entitled to recover pursuant to Rue v. State, Dept. of Highways
Vigreaux v. Dept. of Transp. & Dev. 535 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
A holding that NOPSI could not be liable as a matter of law because the plaintiff either lost control of his vehicle on his own or was forced off the road by a phantom vehicle would conflict with the holding in Rue v. State, Dept. of Highways
Wall v. Alleman 519 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Moon v. City of Baton Rouge 522 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Coleman v. State, Through DOTD 524 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
A landmark case in this area is Rue v. State, Dept. of Highways
Kyle v. City of Bogalusa 506 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Rue v. State, Department of *723 Highways
Blair v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 502 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Sinitiere v. Lavergne, [ ], supra; Rue v. State, Dept. of Highways
Deville v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 498 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Rue v. State, Dept. of Highways, on remand, (La.App.