Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Chopin, 372 So. 2d 1222.

157 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Ray Allen Parker La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. Rudy Emanuel Melerine La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
State v, Chopin, n.2 ( La.
State of Louisiana v. Lonnie B. Kirklin, Jr. A/K/A Lonnie Bernard Kirklin, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
See, n. 2 (La.1979) (“Since the evidence adduced at trial does not affect the result we reach in the instant case, our relation of the pertinent facts is based only upon the testimony given at the suppression hearing.”); n. 2 (La.1978)(same).
State Of Louisiana v. Jordan Cyprian La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana in the Interest of M.J. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Ricky Guidry La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State Of Louisiana v. Christopher James Landry La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State v. Jefferson 261 So. 3d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Magee 243 So. 3d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Flowers 204 So. 3d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Barnes 203 So. 3d 1090 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
-1225 (La.1979), the defendant notes that in this case the police did not receive information connecting him to any criminal activity.
State v. Daigle 167 So. 3d 980 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
1223 n. 2 (La.1979); State v. Dunham, 12-0826 (La.App.
State v. Carter 167 So. 3d 970 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Bell 169 So. 3d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Briley 151 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
1224 n. 2 (La.1979); (La.App.
State v. Henry 147 So. 3d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. McClendon 133 So. 3d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Morgan , 09-2352 at p. 8, 59 So.3d at 408 .
State v. Norah 131 So. 3d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
1224 n. 2 (La.1979); (La.App.
State v. Dunham 111 So. 3d 1095 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Lilly 111 So. 3d 45 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Thompson 93 So. 3d 553 La. 2012
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); Tucker, 626 So.2d at 710 ; State v, Andrishok
State of Louisiana v. Ordesto Marando Toussaint La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
1/17/95), n. 2 (La.1979) (listing cases ).
State v. Toussaint 94 So. 3d 62 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
P. 10 (La.1/17/95), , , 1223 n. 2 (La.1979) (listing cases).
State v. Lewis 85 So. 3d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
If the property is abandoned or otherwise disposed of as a result of any prior unlawful intrusion, it “cannot be legally seized by the police officers.”
State in Interest of PL 81 So. 3d 983 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2012
Tucker, 626 So.2d at 710
State v. Wesley 77 So. 3d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Friday 73 So. 3d 913 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Morgan 59 So. 3d 403 La. 2011
State v. Butler 46 So. 3d 673 La. 2010
State v. Richardson 23 So. 3d 254 La. 2009
While the use of a spotlight to illuminate an individual or an automobile on a public street may constitute a seizure when combined with other circumstances, such as a blocking action taken by the police to impede any progress, see, -25 (La.l979)(when police officers blocked defendant’s path by swinging their patrol unit around, switching on their bright lights, and braking three feet in front of him they seized defendant because their approach “clearly indicated that some form of official deten
State ex rel. J.S. 6 So. 3d 904 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
State v. Bozeman 6 So. 3d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Jarrell 994 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Pennison 986 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Thomas 981 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Lizotte 977 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Pichon 977 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Zachary 973 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Bonds 973 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Belton, 441 So.2d at 1199 (citing Andrishok, 434 So.2d at 391 ; (La.
State v. Hinojosa 966 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Brister 966 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Walker 953 So. 2d 786 La. 2007
State v. Hayden, 98-2768 (La.App.4Cir.5/17/00)
State v. Brumfield 944 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Young 943 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Caples 938 So. 2d 147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Maten 899 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Hardeman 906 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Sherman 886 So. 2d 1116 La. 2004
See, n. 2 (La.1979)("Since the evidence adduced at trial does not affect the result we reach in the instant case, our relation of the pertinent facts is based only upon the testimony given at the suppression hearing."); n. 2 (La.1978)(same).
State of Louisiana v. Brian Keith Poullard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
1/17/95), n. 2 (La.1979) (listing cases).
State v. Poullard 863 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Brooks, 92-3331, p. 10 (La.1/17/95), , , 1223 n. 2 (La.1979) ( listing cases ).