Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Chaisson v. Domingue, 372 So. 2d 1225.

269 citing documents.

Lee v. Ford Motor Co. 457 So. 2d 193 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Art. 966; Sanders v. Hercules Sheet Metal, Inc., Travelers Ins.
26 457 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Article 966; Sanders v. Hercules Sheet Metal, Inc., Travelers Ins.
Whitaker v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. 454 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Art. 966; Sanders v. Hercules Sheet Metal, Inc., Travelers Ins.
Kirklin v. Keller 453 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
The burden of showing that there is not an issue of material fact is on the mover, and all doubts must be resolved against the granting of the motion for summary judgment and is favor of a trial on the merits
Hall v. Park Dell Terrace Partnership 452 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
South Louisiana Systems, Inc. v. Boone 451 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Budget Finance of Baton Rouge, Inc. v. Lewis 451 So. 2d 1300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Manning v. Better Way Coatings, Inc. 448 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Baker v. Ingram 447 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Gela v. Hamdan 446 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Art. 966; Industrial Sand and Abrasives, Thornhill v. Black, Sivalls and Bryson, Inc.
Wattigney v. Jefferson Parish School Board 445 So. 2d 1318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Laque v. St. Charles Parish 444 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Nathans v. Vuci 443 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Chevron USA, Inc. v. Lorio 442 So. 2d 1157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Lytell v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. 439 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Clay v. Argonaut-Southwest Insurance Co. 435 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
” In the instant case, the record undeniably shows that neither Gray nor Stonewall have ever issued a policy of uninsured motorist to anyone in the State of Louisiana.
Magill v. Owen Const. Co., Inc. 434 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Article 966; Sanders v. Hercules Sheet Metal, Inc.
Fallo v. Tuboscope Inspection, Intracoastal Pipe Repair & Supply Co. 435 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
tories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to material fact, and that the mover is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Dixie Campers, Thornhill v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc., Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc., (Emphasis added) In this regard, the jurisprudence holds that only when reasonable minds must inevitably conclude that the mover is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the facts before the co
Manzella v. Terrebonne Parish Police Jury 432 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Butler v. K-Mart Corp. 432 So. 2d 968 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Travelers Ins. Co. v. Blanchard 431 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Art. 966; Sanders v. Hercules Sheet Metal, Inc.
Hoskins v. Caplis 431 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Art. 966; Sanders v. Hercules Sheet Metal, Inc.
PHILLIPS AS TUTRIX OF PHILLIPS v. Roy 431 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Art. 966; Sanders v. Hercules Sheet Metal, Inc.
Barnhill v. American Well Service & Salvage 432 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
The Louisiana Supreme Court, (La.
Bartlett v. Calhoun 430 So. 2d 1358 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Richards v. Daniels 430 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Burke v. Occidental Life Ins. Co. of Cal. 427 So. 2d 1165 La. 1983
Sutherland v. Time Saver Stores, Inc. 428 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Pellegal v. Dureau 427 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Boudreaux v. Pipe Line Technologists, Inc. 426 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Credithrift of America, Inc. v. Williams 426 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Henderson v. Administrators of Tulane Univ. 426 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Dette v. Covington Motors, Inc. 426 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Skinner v. Papania's 425 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Sanders v. Hercules Sheet Metal, Inc., Employers’
Frye v. Texas Brine Corp. 425 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Sanders v. Hercules Sheet Metal, Inc., (La.
Bacon v. Diamond Motors, Inc. 424 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Lindsay v. Opt, Inc. 423 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Riviere v. Bethard 422 So. 2d 1341 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
3rd Cir.1982), where the Supreme Court stated: "It is well settled that a motion for summary judgment should be granted if, and only if, the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to material fact, and that mover
Adams v. Travelers Ins. Co. 420 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
La.Code of Civil Procedure Article 966; Employers' Surplus Line Ins.
Parker v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 418 So. 2d 1361 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Harris 417 So. 2d 1370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Similarly, where it was undisputed that the teacher-plaintiff had been injured while attending a school band concert, summary judgment was not appropriate where it was unclear whether the moving party, her professional liability insurer, was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
Burke v. Occidental Life Ins. Co. of Cal. 416 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Jeffreys v. Mixon 415 So. 2d 332 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Clay v. Southern Scrap Material Co. 412 So. 2d 1389 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Art. 966; Dixie Campers, Inc., v. Vesely Co.
Allen v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 409 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Home Insurance Co. v. Simon 411 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
SUMMARY JUDGMENT The standard for determining the propriety of granting a where the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: “It is well settled that a motion for summary judgment should be granted if, and only if, the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to material fact, and t
Nicholas v. Jenkins 411 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
the Supreme Court stated as follows: “It is well settled that a motion for summary judgment should be granted if, and only if, the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, admissions ■ on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to material fact, and that
Munson v. Safeco Ins. Co. 411 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Thompson v. South Central Bell Tel. Co. 411 So. 2d 26 La. 1982
Bertrand v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc. 406 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Sanders v. Hercules Sheet Metal, Inc.