Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Benton Casing Service, Inc. v. Avemco Ins. Co., 379 So. 2d 225.

42 citing documents.

Survia v. Colley 94 So. 3d 890 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Yount v. Lafayette Insurance Co. 4 So. 3d 162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Wallace v. First Assur. Life of America 862 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Legros v. GREAT AMERICAN INS. CO. OF NY 865 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Wickramasekra v. ASSOC. INTERN. INS. CO. 890 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Campbell v. Markel American Ins. Co. 822 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
LeBlanc v. Babin 786 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
Co., ("one section or its placement is not to be construed separately and at the expense of disregarding other sections or placements"); Hartford, 584 So.2d at 1229 ("[n]o single portion of an insurance contract should be construed independent of the whole, i.e., the policy is to be construed in its entirety
Mobley v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 674 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. Valentine 665 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Benton Casing Service, Hartford Acc.
Oaks v. Dupuy 653 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
South Cent. Bell v. Ka-Jon Food Stores 644 So. 2d 357 La. 1994
Co., on reh'g; Benton v. Long Mfg.
Husband v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 635 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Brooks v. Crosby 629 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Perault v. Time Ins. Co. 633 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Louisiana Commercial Bank v. GEORGIA INTERNATIONAL LIFE INS. CO. 618 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Cowen v. Mercury Finance Co. 607 So. 2d 1067 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Benton Casing Service, Inc., v. Avemco Ins.
Distinguished Stream v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 608 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Appellants rely on Benton Casing Service
Veillon v. US Fire Ins. Co. 590 So. 2d 1368 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Pareti, supra ; Benton Casing Serv.
Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. Joe Dean Contr. 584 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Pareti, supra ; Benton Casing Serv.
Foret v. LOUISIANA FARM BUR. CAS. INS. 582 So. 2d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Central Louisiana Elec. Co. v. Westinghouse 579 So. 2d 981 La. 1991
Humphrey v. Aetna Life & Casualty Insurance Co. 572 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
McWright v. Modern Iron Works, Inc. 567 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Pareti v. Sentry Indem. Co. 536 So. 2d 417 La. 1988
Benton Casing Service, Inc., v. Avemco Ins.
Puckett v. State Farm Ins. Co. 526 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
In Benton Casing Service, the Supreme Court found that an item on a declarations page of the aircraft policy limiting coverage to the named pilot was not an "exclusion," but a "statement" by the insured.
Barras v. Benoit 509 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Co., Benton Casing Service
US Fire Ins. v. W. Monroe Charter Service 504 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
In support of their argument, appellees rely on Benton Casing Service, (La.
Bingham v. St. Paul Ins. Co. 503 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Benton Casing Service, Harvey v. Mister Lynn's, Inc., (La.App.
Bonner v. United States Fire Ins. Co. 494 So. 2d 1311 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Pinell v. Patterson Services, Inc. 491 So. 2d 637 La. 1986
Prudential Property & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Stuckey 486 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Oceanonics, Inc. v. Petroleum Distributing Co., supra; Benton Casing Service
Pinell v. Patterson Services, Inc. 481 So. 2d 594 La. 1986
Bozeman v. Com. Land Title Ins. Co. 470 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Benton Casing Services, , (La.1979).
Hebert v. First American Ins. Co. 461 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
4th Cir. 1981) writ denied 1982; Benton Casing Service, (La.App.
Nida v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 454 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Co., Benton Casing Service, Inc. v. Avemco, Ins.
Pique v. Saia 450 So. 2d 654 La. 1984
Co., Benton Casing Service, Inc. v. Avemco, Ins.
Matherne v. Hartford Insurance Co. 444 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Benton Casing Service, Harvey v. Mr. Lynn’s, Inc., (La.App.
Crowson v. Reserve Life Insurance Co. 438 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Petrol Industries Inc. v. Gearhart-Owen Industries, Inc. 424 So. 2d 1059 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Stewart v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. 420 So. 2d 1217 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
The law applicable to insurance exclusions was stated by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Benton Casing Service, : "[4] Briefly stated, the law is to the effect that the insurer is required to clearly express exclusions to its insuring obligations and that any doubt or ambiguity is to be resolved against the insurer, against forfeiture, and in favor of what reason and probability dictate was intended by the parties with
Harvey v. Mr. Lynn's, Inc. 416 So. 2d 960 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Perrilloux v. First Standard Life Ins. 396 So. 2d 427 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
nce policy provides indemnity for the “loss of a hand”, or the “loss of a foot”, or the “loss of an arm”, and provides in the policy a definition or a specific statement as to what shall constitute a loss of such member, effect must be given to this qualifying definition or explanation.” These principles of interpretation were reaffirmed by the Court in Benton Casing Service, and Hall v. National Life & Acc.