Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Reck v. Stevens, 373 So. 2d 498.

1552 citing documents.

Tremblay v. Allstate Insurance Company 955 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
239 , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [ v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages."
Wesley Duhon v. Billy Harsity La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
and Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., we raise the award to the lowest reasonable amount, or $31,900.00.
Lawrence v. City of Shreveport 948 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Parfait v. Transocean Offshore, Inc. 950 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Suire v. LCS Corrections Services, Inc., XXXX-XXXX, pp. 5-6, (La.App.
McDaniel v. Hamilton 945 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Johnson v. State Ex Rel. DOTD 946 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
239 , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that [T]he discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great, and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
Jordan v. Vice 943 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Robert C. Jordan v. Zoie R. Vice La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Paul Darren Williams v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co. and Venson R. Aymond La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Williams v. Aymond 945 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Delton Ray Coutee v. Rayland K. Beurlot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Coutee v. Beurlot 943 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Lino v. Allstate Insurance Co. 937 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Christal Suire v. Lcs Corrections Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: this Court commented on appellate review of general damage awards and on the “much discretion” in fixing damages accorded to trial courts by La.Civ.Code art. 1934(3)(1870).
Suire v. LCS Corrections Services, Inc. 930 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: this Court commented on appellate *226 review of general damage awards and on the "much discretion" in fixing damages accorded to trial courts by La.
Williams v. Roberts 930 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
239 , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
Rico v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 929 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Viviano v. Progressive SEC. Ins. Co. 920 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
1976), to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
Raines v. Columbia Lakeland Medical Center 923 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Ainsworth v. Anderson 920 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Joseph Moraus v. Jennifer Frederick La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Inc., 99-0934 (La.10/29/99)
Moraus v. Frederick 916 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Inc., 99-0934 (La.10/29/99)
Royce Monk v. State of La., Dotd Consolidated With Dana Vezinat v. State of La., Dotd Consolidated With … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Monk v. State Ex Rel. DOTD 908 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Bailey v. Nunez 898 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
As we have found no error in the trial court's findings of fact and credibility calls, we now apply the standard for reviewing the general damage award based on findings of four years of pain and suffering by the time of trial with no end in sight: In Reck [v. Stevens, ], this court disapproved the appellate court's simply reviewing the medical evidence and then concluding that the award for those injuries was excessive, without taking into consideration the particular effect of the particular i
Daniels v. Seruntine 900 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Inc., 99-0934 (La.10/29/99)
Ginger McIntosh, Indiv. v. Wayne F. McElveen, Sheriff La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
And, “[i]t is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive or insufficient.”
McIntosh v. McElveen 893 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Noran J. Robin, Jr., Et Ux. v. Allstate Indemnity Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
And, “[i]t is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review be considered either excessive or insufficient,”
Robin v. Allstate Indemnity Co. 889 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
And, “[i]t is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review be considered either excessive or insufficient,”
Wright v. General Aviation Co. 889 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
Foreman v. Babin 887 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
Joseph v. Houston 886 So. 2d 1133 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
Thibodeaux v. Jurgelsky 879 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Cole v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY 886 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
1 Cir. 11/9/01) , , writ denied, 02-0635 (La.5/10/02)
Baudier v. Cheron 876 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
See, Reck v. Stevens, supra, (La.App.
Scarbrough v. OK Guard Dogs 879 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
1 Cir. 11/9/01) , , writ denied, 02-0635 (La.5/10/02)
Glen J. Moody v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
The standard of this court’s and was confirmed in Youn v. Maritime Overseas, Corp., cert.
Moody v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. 872 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
and was confirmed in Youn v. Maritime Overseas, Corp., cert.
Craft v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 874 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Reichert v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 96-1419, 96-1460 (La.5/20/97)
Riley v. Salley 874 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. 878 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
1 Cir. 11/9/01) , , writ denied, 02-0635 (La.5/10/02)
Vera R. Paine v. Avoyelles Council on Aging La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
239, (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
Paine v. Avoyelles Council on Aging 869 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
239 , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great,” and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
Craige v. Broome 869 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
239 , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [ v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
Engles v. City of New Orleans 872 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Dana Desselle v. Michael Lafleur La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
The standard for an appellate court’s and was confirmed in Youn v. Maritime Overseas, Corp., cert.
Desselle v. LaFleur 865 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
and was confirmed in Youn v. Maritime Overseas, Corp., cert.
Alexander v. Ford 866 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
Thonn v. Cook 863 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003