Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Reck v. Stevens, 373 So. 2d 498.

1552 citing documents.

Stokes v. Stewart 774 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
In Reck [v. Stevens, ], this court disapproved the appellate court's simply reviewing the medical evidence and then concluding that the award for those injuries was excessive, without taking into consideration the particular effect of the particular injuries on the particular plaintiff.
Quinn v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 774 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Evans v. Nogues 775 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
In Reck [v. Stevens, (La.
Thibodeaux v. Bernard 772 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
239 , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. 773 So. 2d 670 La. 2000
Inc., 99-0934 (La.10/29/99)
Scott v. Pyles 770 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
LeBlanc v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. 772 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994)
Orillac v. Solomon 765 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Gladney, supra ; De Los Reyes, supra .
Jones v. SUPER ONE FOODS/BROOKSHIRES GROCERY COMPANY 774 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Co., 30,765 (La.App.2d Cir. 8/19/98), ; (La.
Bowers v. Liuzza 769 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
And, “[i]t |1Pis only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review be considered either excessive or insufficient,”
Harvey ex rel. Bates v. T.H.E. Insurance 764 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Hunt v. Long 763 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Faulkner v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 25,857 (La.
Lombas v. Southern Foods, Inc. 760 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
And, “[i]t is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review be considered either excessive or insufficient,”
McPherson v. LAKE AREA MEDICAL CENTER 767 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
239 , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
Cooper v. Lacorte 775 So. 2d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Simon v. American Crescent Elevator Co. 767 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Domonter v. CF Bean Corp. 761 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
Thom v. Benson Chevrolet Co. 759 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
LaBove v. Raftery 759 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Straughter v. Ellebnawi 759 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Hooker v. Super Products Corp., 98-1107 (La.App.
James v. Jones 759 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
Skipper v. Berry 762 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
appellate courts are to afford vast discretion to a trial court’s determination of general damages.
Mannina v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 757 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
Knepper v. Robin 745 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Barrociere v. Batiste 752 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Lee v. State 751 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Cole v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 755 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994)
Cole v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 755 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994)
Hymel ex rel. Hymel v. Thomas 758 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Guillot v. Valley Forge Ins. Co. 753 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
239 , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [ v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
Bridgers v. Southwest Louisiana Hospital Ass'n 746 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Andrus, 670 So.2d at 1210
Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. 747 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
appellate courts afford discretion to a trial court's determination as to general damages.
Strong v. Farm Bureau Ins. Co. 743 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Thompson v. Coates, 29,333 (La.App.2d Cir. 05/07/97), .
Cone v. National Emergency Services, Inc. 747 So. 2d 1085 La. 1999
Hughes v. Bossier Parish School Bd. 745 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Hae Woo Youn v. Maritime Overseas, supra
Gray Ins. Co. v. Hunter 752 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Kemper v. Don Coleman, Jr., Builder, Inc. 746 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Dixie Sav. and Loan Ass'n v. Pitre 751 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Taylor v. Premier Insurance 742 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Hooker v. Super Products Corp. 751 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Posecai v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 731 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Arbourgh v. Sweet Basil Bistro, Inc. 740 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Reichert v. State, DOTD, 96-1419, 96-1460 (La.5/20/97)
Bernard v. City of Lafayette 735 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Stevens v. Hartford Ins.
Bowie v. International Indemnity Co. 734 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Thus, on review, an appellate court may reverse a trial court’s award of general damages only upon finding that the trial court abused its discretion.
Odom v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HOSP. 733 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Meshell v. Lovell 732 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Andrus, 670 So.2d at 1210
Edwards v. Daugherty 729 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Hardy v. Poydras Properties 737 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
George v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 722 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Bell v. Ayio 731 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by