Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Giovanni, 375 So. 2d 1360.
-
State v. Reeves
11 So. 3d 1031
La. 2009
appeal after remand, a husband and wife were shot in their home and the house was set afire.
-
State v. Thompson
806 So. 2d 150
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
1754, p. 6 (La.9/5/96), , the Supreme Court stated: This court has considered this issue and determined that “it is the circumstances indicating the intent to effect an extended restraint on the liberty of the accused, rather than the precise timing of an officer’s statements: ‘You are under arrest,’ that are determinative of when an arrest is actually made.” (La.
-
State v. Diaz
800 So. 2d 1090
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
This court has considered this issue and determined that “it is the circumstances indicating intent to effect an extended restraint on the liberty of the accused, rather than the precise timing of an officer’s statements: ‘You are under arrest,’ that are determinative of when an arrest is actually made.” ().
-
State v. Broussard
769 So. 2d 1257
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
1754, p. 6 (La.9/5/96); , the Supreme Court stated: This court has considered this issue and determined that “it is the circumstances indicating the intent to effect an extended restraint on the liberty of the accused, rather than the precise timing of an officer’s statements: ‘You are under arrest,’ that are determinative of when an arrest is actually made.” (); [sic]
-
State v. Smith
761 So. 2d 642
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
754, p. 6 (La.9/5/96), , the Supreme Court stated: This court has considered this issue and determined that “it is the circumstances indicating the intent to effect an extended restraint on the liberty of the accused, rather than the precise timing' of an officer’s statements: ‘You are under arrest,’ that are determinative of when an arrest is actually made.” (); [sic]
- State v. Creecy 742 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
- Melder v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. 731 So. 2d 991 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
- State v. Smiley 729 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
-
Cooks v. Rodenbeck
711 So. 2d 444
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
for the proposition that an arrest of a material witness without a validly-obtained and issued warrant under La.R.S.
-
State v. Amos
714 So. 2d 775
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
This court has considered this issue and determined that “it is the circumstances indicating intent to effect an extended restraint on the liberty- of the accused, rather than the precise timing of an officer’s statements: “You are under arrest,’ that are determinative of when an arrest is actually made.” (); see also
- State v. Fisher 692 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
- State v. Allen 682 So. 2d 713 La. 1996
- Anderson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 675 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
- Harrison v. Phillips 539 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
- State v. Freeman 503 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
-
State v. Clark
492 So. 2d 862
La. 1986
affirmed after remand, (La.
- State v. Johnson 457 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
- State v. McKeel 443 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
- State v. Beck 445 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
- State v. Brown 445 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
- State v. Serrato 424 So. 2d 214 La. 1982
- State v. Rebstock 418 So. 2d 1306 La. 1982
- State v. Giovanni 409 So. 2d 593 La. 1982
- State v. Liner 397 So. 2d 506 La. 1981
- State v. Bell 395 So. 2d 805 La. 1981
- State v. Zielman 384 So. 2d 359 La. 1980
- State v. Bennett 383 So. 2d 1236 La. 1980