DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hunter, 375 So. 2d 99.

66 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. K.B. La. 2025
  • State of Louisiana v. Roosevelt T. Ardison La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
    Sibron v. New York, 392 U.S. 40, 88 S. Ct. 1889, 20 L. Ed. 2d 917 (1968); (La.
  • State v. Gayden 133 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 3/19/97) , (-102 (La.1979)).
  • State v. Lockett 120 So. 3d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Butler 101 So. 3d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Simpson 77 So. 3d 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Sander 69 So. 3d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Thomas 8 So. 3d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Sims, 02-2208, p. 6 (La.6/27/03)
  • State v. Huntley 986 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Lowery 890 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • State v. Cowart 862 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Barney, 97-777, p. 6 (La.App.
  • State v. Sims 851 So. 2d 1039 La. 2003
  • State v. Malveaux 852 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Lange 832 So. 2d 397 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    -102 (La.1979) (final citation omitted).
  • State v. Cooper 830 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Legett 819 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Jones 773 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Lipscomb 770 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Brown 773 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    101— 102 (La.1979), the Supreme Court explained that a police officer who has justification under La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Jones 769 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Hughes 765 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    -102 (La.1979) (final citation omitted).
  • State v. Patterson 758 So. 2d 955 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    -02 (La.1979) (final citation omitted).
  • State v. Myers 756 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Fortier 756 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Tyler 749 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    -102 (La.1979) (final citation omitted).
  • State v. Johnson 748 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Littles 742 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Creecy 742 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that, even after a lawful investigatory stop, a police officer is justified in frisking the subject only under circumstances that warrant a prudent man to believe that his safety or that of others is in danger.
  • State v. Martin 738 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    Gresham, 712 So.2d at 952.
  • State v. Smiley 729 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Williams 729 So. 2d 142 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Drake 733 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    said: While it is true that an officer is never justified in conducting a pat-down for weapons unless the original detention itself was justified, a lawful detention for questioning does not necessarily give the officer the authority to conduct a patdown for weapons.
  • State v. Willis 728 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Sheehan 740 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    -102 (La.1979), the Supreme Court explained that a police officer who has justification under La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Gresham 712 So. 2d 946 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    1889, 1903 , 20 L.Ed.2d 917, 935 (1968); State v. Edwards, 630 So.2d at 304 .
  • State v. Sanders 717 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    State v. Mitchell, supra .
  • State v. Lewis 728 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Anderson 696 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Mitchell 692 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    1981) wherein it held: While it is true that an officer is never justified in conducting a pat-down for weapons unless the original detention itself was justified, a lawful detention for questioning does not necessarily give the officer the authority to conduct a pat-down for weapons.
  • State v. Denis 691 So. 2d 1295 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Lavigne 675 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    -102 (La.1979), the court stated: While it is true that an officer is never justified in conducting a pat-down for weapons unless the original detention itself was justified, a lawful detention for questioning does not necessarily give the officer authority to conduct a pat-down for weapons.
  • State v. Riley 673 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    [citation omitted] -102 (La.
  • State v. Williams 665 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Livings 664 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    However, although a police officer is not always justified in frisking a suspect for weapons after a lawful stop, a weapon frisk is justified under circumstances where a "reasonably prudent man ...
  • State v. Johnson 660 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Scull 639 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Solomon 634 So. 2d 1330 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    Also, -102 (La.1979), (quoted in and relied on in State v. Thibodeaux, supra ): "While it is true that an officer is never justified in conducting a pat-down for weapons unless the original detention itself was justified, a lawful detention for questioning does not necessarily give the officer the authority to conduct a
  • State v. Edwards 630 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Davis 612 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    -102 (La.1979): *258 While it is true that an officer is never justified in conducting pat-down for weapons unless the original detention itself was justified, a lawful detention for questioning does not necessarily give the officer authority to conduct a pat-down for weapons.
  • State v. Tucker 604 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    art. 215.1; Terry v. Ohio, supra; State v. Bolden, supra.