DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Goetz, 374 So. 2d 1219.

16 citing documents.

  • State v. Shirley 10 So. 3d 224 La. 2009
  • State v. Meredith 833 So. 2d 1125 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. White 535 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Rowell 517 So. 2d 799 La. 1988
  • State v. Bailey 500 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Fairleigh 490 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Tanner 457 So. 2d 1172 La. 1984
  • State v. Corkran 448 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    intoxication test regulations) : "Because an intoxication test conducted with chemicals of inferior quality could bring to bear a practically conclusive presumption of guilt against an innocent person, it is essential that the officially promulgated methods, procedures and techniques include a thorough analysis of the chemicals by a
  • State v. Tanner 446 So. 2d 370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    The crux of defendant’s argument rested on two Louisiana Supreme Court decisions, and State *372 v. Krause
  • State v. Doucet 443 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    The court enunciated the rationale applicable to the statutory presumption of intoxication, : "Because an intoxication test conducted with chemicals of inferior quality could bring to bear a practically conclusive presumption of guilt against an innocent person, it is essential that the officially promulgated methods, procedures and techniques include a thorough analysis of the chemicals by a chemis
  • State v. Tanner 438 So. 2d 1105 La. 1983
  • State v. Krause 405 So. 2d 832 La. 1981
  • State v. Gregory 403 So. 2d 1225 La. 1981
  • State v. Morrison 392 So. 2d 1037 La. 1980
    which involved a DWI prosecution *1039 where a challenge to evidence from a breath analysis machine was sustained, the state made the argument that the impropriety was harmless error because of the existence of other independent evidence of the defendant's intoxication.
  • State v. Westbrook 392 So. 2d 1043 La. 1980
  • State v. Westbrook 385 So. 2d 13 La. 1980
    32:662 presumption of a defendant’s intoxication arising from chemical analysis, we hold that at trial the state must show that the individual who approved the relevant machine for use has been certified to perform maintenance by the Department of Health and Human Resources.