DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mathews, 375 So. 2d 1165.

72 citing documents.

  • State v. Brockington 437 So. 2d 994 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Korman 439 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    the Louisiana Supreme Court used Jackson as a springboard to create appellate fact review of sufficiency of the evidence in criminal cases in spite of the Louisiana constitutional provision to the contrary.
  • State v. Jacobs 435 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Gatson 434 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    In spite of these constitutional provisions, however
  • State v. Bowman 434 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State, in Interest of Racine 433 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    However, a majority of the Louisiana Supreme Court determined that the United States Supreme Court case of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Oliney 430 So. 2d 1294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    a majority of the Louisiana Supreme Court determined that the United States Supreme Court case of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Vaughn 431 So. 2d 358 La. 1983
  • State v. Richardson 425 So. 2d 1228 La. 1983
  • State v. Johnson 426 So. 2d 95 La. 1983
  • State v. Ruple 426 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    SPECIFICATION OF ERROR NO. 1— a majority of the Louisiana Supreme Court determined that the United States Supreme Court case of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Richards 426 So. 2d 1314 La. 1982
  • State v. Ennis 414 So. 2d 661 La. 1982
    I and its progeny because I am only a temporary (as distinguished from ad hoc ) member of this Court and feel compelled because of the nature of this appointment to comply with the jurisprudential rules established by the permanent members of this Court.
  • State v. Stewart 400 So. 2d 633 La. 1981
  • State v. Moody 393 So. 2d 1212 La. 1981
  • State Ex Rel. Womack v. Blackburn 393 So. 2d 1216 La. 1981
  • State v. Roy 395 So. 2d 664 La. 1981
    [7] See for example, cases in which the court used both standards of review.
  • State v. Phillips 389 So. 2d 1260 La. 1980
    As the evidence in this case would have justified any rational fact finder in the belief that the state had excluded every reasonable hypothesis of innocence, we now affirm defendant's conviction.
  • State v. King 385 So. 2d 223 La. 1980
    [4] suggested in dicta that it would follow Jackson, following those cases the Court has been less than explicit about which standard applies to this Court's review on direct appeal.
  • State v. Custard 384 So. 2d 428 La. 1980
  • State v. Boutte 384 So. 2d 773 La. 1980
  • State v. Abercrombie 375 So. 2d 1170 La. 1979
    (We have discussed Jackson more fully in State v. Mathews, La., .)