DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Perkins, 374 So. 2d 1234.

55 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Deonta Ware La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
  • State of Louisiana v. Marlon Frank Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Thomas 217 So. 3d 651 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Monroe 198 So. 3d 259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Mitchell , 2000-1399, p. 5, 779 So.2d at 701 -702 ( Fullilove, 389 So.2d at 1284 ; ).
  • State v. Simms 143 So. 3d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Mitchell , 2000-1399, p. 5, 779 So.2d at 701 -702 ( Fullilove, 389 So.2d at 1284 ; ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Paxton Jules Trahan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Fullilove, 389 So.2d at 1284
  • State v. Trahan 61 So. 3d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Fullilove, 389 So.2d at 1284
  • State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Edward Boyer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Fullilove, 389 So.2d at 1284
  • State v. Boyer 56 So. 3d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Fullilove, 389 So.2d at 1284 ; State v. Harvill, 403, So.2d 706, 711 (La.1981).
  • State of Louisiana v. Kendall Paul Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    Fullilove, 389 So.2d at 1284
  • State v. Davis 36 So. 3d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Fullilove, 389 So.2d at 1284
  • State v. Loston 874 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • State v. White 850 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Fullilove, 389 So.2d at 1284 ; (La.
  • State v. Mitchell 779 So. 2d 698 La. 2001
    Fullilove, 389 So.2d at 1284
  • State v. Wesley 759 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Brown 692 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. Camp 641 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Armstrong 626 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Clay 612 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Carouthers 607 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Lamark 584 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    State v. Johnson, 541 So.2d at 822 ; -711 (La.1981)
  • State v. Robinson 563 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    Johnson, 541 So.2d at 822 ; -711 (La.1981); (La.
  • State v. Sergon 539 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Johnson 541 So. 2d 818 La. 1989
  • State v. Mullins 537 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Smith 535 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    However, when the defendant is the only person who can dispute the testimony, a reference to the testimony as uncontroverted focuses the jury’s attention on the defendant’s failure to testify.” where the court found the defendant was the only person who could have disputed the testimony, and the attention of the jury was thereby focused on his failure to testify.
  • State v. Chairs 493 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    heavily relied on by Chairs, the Supreme Court of Louisiana stated that when the defendant is the only person who can dispute prosecution-produced testimony, a reference to that testimony as uncontro-verted does unfairly focus the jury’s attention on the accused’s failure to take the witness stand, requirin
  • State v. Newman 491 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Lowe 485 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    See State v. Smith, supra at 696
  • State v. Trahan 481 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Robinson 480 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    455 , 30 L.Ed.2d 468 (1971)
  • State v. Jackson 480 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. O'NEAL 478 So. 2d 1311 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Murray 476 So. 2d 1170 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Martin 475 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. McCarter 469 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    455 , 30 L.Ed.2d 468 (1971)
  • State v. Murphy 463 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    455 , 30 L.Ed.2d 468 (1971)
  • State v. Jackson 454 So. 2d 116 La. 1984
  • State v. Sweeney 443 So. 2d 522 La. 1983
    455 , 30 L.Ed.2d 468 (1971)
  • State v. Hebert 443 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Myers 438 So. 2d 1332 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    455 , 30 L.Ed.2d 468 (1971)
  • State v. Sprinkle 439 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
    [emphasis ours] However, modified its previous rulings, holding: When the defendant is the only person who can dispute the testimony, a reference to the testimony as uncontroverted focuses the jury's attention on the defendant's failure to testify, see United States v. Buege, 578 F.2d 187 (7th Cir. 1978).
  • State v. Triplett 434 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    where the court held that when the defendant is the only person who can dispute the testimony, a reference to the testimony as uncontroverted focuses the jury's attention on the defendant's failure to testify so as to violate article 770's prohibition against such remarks.
  • State v. Craddock 435 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Smith 433 So. 2d 688 La. 1983
  • State v. Simone 428 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Burkhalter 428 So. 2d 449 La. 1983
  • State v. McCabe 420 So. 2d 955 La. 1982
    455 , 30 L.Ed.2d 468 (1971)
  • State v. Latin 412 So. 2d 1357 La. 1982
  • State v. Dewey 408 So. 2d 1255 La. 1982
    455 , 30 L.Ed.2d 468 (1971)