Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Boneventure, 374 So. 2d 1238.

21 citing documents.

State v. Fontenot 550 So. 2d 179 La. 1989
2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983); (La.
State v. Ford 525 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
“Thus, included in the general concept of probable cause is the necessary element of a reasonable belief that the contraband or evidence will not have been disposed of but will remain at the place to be searched at the time of the proposed search.”
State v. Thompson 483 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
defendant argues that included in the general concept of probable cause is the necessary element of a reasonable belief that the contraband will not have been disposed of, but will have remained at the place to be searched at the time of the proposed search.
Distinguished State v. Brown 479 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
relied on by defendant in support of this allegation.
State v. Johnson 467 So. 2d 20 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
are controlling on the present case.
State v. Durand 461 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Fleniken 451 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
(Dennis, J., concurring); cf .
State v. Howard 448 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
as authority for the proposition that a reason or belief that contraband or evidence will not be disposed of but will remain at the place to be searched at the time of the proposed search as a necessary element which must be included within the general concept of probable cause.
State v. Howard 448 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Morris 444 So. 2d 1200 La. 1984
State v. Dunn 442 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
concluding]’ that probable cause existed.” for the proposition that the use of the term “quantity” in an affidavit to describe the amount of illegal drugs to be seized has been condemned by the Louisiana Supreme Court as failing to provide a sufficiently detailed factual basis for determining probable cau
Distinguished State v. Stroud 438 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
In support of his argument
State v. Wise 434 So. 2d 1308 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Bruno 427 So. 2d 1174 La. 1983
State v. Roubique 421 So. 2d 859 La. 1982
State v. Cann 392 So. 2d 381 La. 1981
State v. Huff 392 So. 2d 1046 La. 1980
State v. Armstead 385 So. 2d 241 La. 1980
As we have previously stated, “included within the general concept of probable cause is the necessary element of a reasonable belief that the contraband or evidence will not be disposed of but will remain at the place to be searched at the time of the proposed search.”
State v. Lewis 385 So. 2d 226 La. 1980
to argue that the affidavit for this reason failed to establish probable cause.
State v. Nelson 381 So. 2d 477 La. 1980
State v. Ragsdale 381 So. 2d 492 La. 1980
State v. Boneventure (and Buchanan), State v. Morgan, supra.