Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Abercrombie, 375 So. 2d 1170.

76 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Lisa W. Rabalais La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State v. Cotton 980 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Merritt 877 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Morgan 863 So. 2d 520 La. 2004
However, a case in which the defendant was convicted and sentenced for the second degree murder of a Catholic priest, we considered the admissibility of evidence of other acts of vandalism and assault and battery against the Catholic Church and its personnel.
State v. Sprinkle 801 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), -1178 (La.1979), cert.
State v. Ledet 792 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), -1178 (La.1979), cert.
State v. Mills 790 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), -1178 (La.1979), cert.
State v. Slocum 791 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), -1178 (La.1979), cert.
State v. Evans 786 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), -1178 (La.1979).
State ex rel. D.J. 783 So. 2d 558 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), and adopted by | ¿
State ex rel. D.P. 783 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Eskano 779 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), -1178 (La.1979), cert.
State v. Lapell 777 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560, 573 (1979); -1178 (La.
State v. Jones 777 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), -1178 (La.1979), cert.
State v. Cazenave 772 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560, 573 (1979); -1178 (La.
State v. Dickerson 772 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560, 573 (1979); -1178 (La.1979), cert.
State v. Lewis 764 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560, 573 (1979); -1178 (La.
State v. Wickem 759 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Pollard 760 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
The Louisiana Supreme Court pointed out the difference between "intent" and "motive" (La.
State v. Williams 738 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560, 573 (1979); -1178 (La.1979), cert.
State v. Cordero 738 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560, 573 (1979); -1178 (La.1979), cert.
State v. Holmes 735 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), cert.
State v. Muneer 733 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), -1178 (La.
State v. Rainey 722 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), -1178 (La.1979), cert.
State v. Westmoreland 721 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), -1178 (La.1979), cert.
State v. Guidroz 721 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), -1178 (La.1979), cert.
State v. Morris 719 So. 2d 1076 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), -1178 (La.1979), cert.
State v. Bell 709 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), -1178 (La.1979), cert.
State v. Hubbard 708 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), -1178 (La.1979), cert.
State v. Sias 706 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), cert.
State v. Davis 702 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
State v. Foret 685 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Crawford 672 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
The Louisiana Supreme Court pointed out the difference between "intent" and "motive" wherein Justice Tate, as organ of the court, stated: `While intent and motive are frequently regarded as one and the same thing, there is a clear distinction between them.
State v. Johnson 670 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Abercrombie, [ ] supra
State v. Boudreaux 662 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State v. Abercrombie, [ ], supra
State v. DeRoche 629 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
State v. Abercrombie, [ ], supra; (La.
State v. Tyler 619 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Bonck 613 So. 2d 1125 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
PRIEUR INCIDENT/SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE In the case before us the State, cert.
State v. Tucker 602 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
87) (which involved a reference made by a state witness during defendant’s trial on five counts of first degree murder, to the theft of a radio, which reference the Supreme Court found paled in significance to the five counts of first degree murder and did not portray the defendant as a “bad man” capable of murder); See also, cert.
State v. Fink 601 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
*697 Prior to trial the State filed a Motion of Intent to Use Evidence of Other Crimes pursuant to Article 720 of the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure; (1973) (1979), the purpose stated in the notice of using evidence of other crimes being to show defendant's knowledge, intent, guilty knowledge, system and motive.
State v. Driggers 554 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Jackson 552 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
at 2789 ; -78 (La.1979), cert.
State v. Burger 550 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Rexrode 536 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Mussall 523 So. 2d 1305 La. 1988
State v. Howard 520 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Hereford 518 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Cupit 508 So. 2d 996 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Perry 502 So. 2d 543 La. 1986
1443 , 75 L.Ed.2d 799 ; cert.
State v. Luwisch 468 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
” As in Vernon , the other crimes shown at Luwisch’s Prieur hearing were of a lesser nature.