Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Edwards, 406 So. 2d 1331.
- State v. Edwards 750 So. 2d 893 La. 1999
-
State v. Howard
751 So. 2d 783
La. 1999
art. 647; Rogers, 419 So.2d at 843 ; .
- State v. Duhe 733 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
- State v. Smith 710 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
-
State v. Labostrie
702 So. 2d 1194
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
The State argues the question and the answer were admissible to "explain the sequence of events leading to the arrest of the defendant from the viewpoint of the arresting officers," cert.
- State v. Durham 673 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
- State v. Clark 670 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
- State v. Williams 658 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
- State v. Soler 636 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
-
State v. Moreno
619 So. 2d 62
La. 1993
see also Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89 , 85 S.Ct.
- State v. Perow 616 So. 2d 1336 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
- State v. Williams 610 So. 2d 991 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- State v. Hicks 607 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
- State v. Benedict 607 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- State v. Francise 597 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
-
State v. Vergo
594 So. 2d 1360
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
CCrP Art. 800; U.S. cert.
-
State v. Williams
591 So. 2d 404
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Watson, supra; cert.
-
State v. Williams
591 So. 2d 404
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Watson, supra; cert.
-
State v. Moseley
587 So. 2d 46
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Defendant's argument that this rule should be extended to 17- cert.
- State v. Veal 583 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- State v. McGuire 577 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- State v. Savage 575 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
- State v. Ruffin 572 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
-
State v. Clayton
570 So. 2d 519
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
(citation omitted)" State v. *525 Edwards, cert.
-
State v. Jamison
565 So. 2d 1080
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
*1082 223, 13 L.Ed.2d 142 (1964); (1982).
- State v. McGraw 564 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
- State v. Miles 557 So. 2d 1375 La. 1990
-
State v. Simms
554 So. 2d 757
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
223 , 13 L.Ed.2d 142 (1964)
-
State v. Tarleton
545 So. 2d 1195
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
See: State v. Haarala, supra; cert.
- State v. Isaac 544 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
- State v. Trahan 543 So. 2d 984 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
- State v. Gray 542 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
- State v. Jarmon 543 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- State v. Cassell 540 So. 2d 1219 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
- State v. Ricard 535 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
-
State v. Sampay
532 So. 2d 384
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
“Photographs of the victim’s body are generally relevant to prove corpus delicti; to corroborate other evidence of the manner in which death occurred; to establish the location, severity and number of wounds; to establish the identity of the victim.” cert.
- State, in Interest of Wells 532 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
- State v. Parker 530 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
- State v. Johnson 530 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. Gremillion 529 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
- State v. Wascom 524 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. Porterfield 524 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. Burton 519 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- State v. Geraci 518 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
- State v. Foster 510 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- State v. Prestridge 507 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- State v. Hubbard 506 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- Brown v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc. 509 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
- State v. Mims 505 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
-
State v. Scott
503 So. 2d 1173
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Jackson, supra; cert, denied, 456 U.S. 945 , 102 S.Ct.