Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lozier, 375 So. 2d 1333.

32 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Terrell Lee Anthony La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. Justin Lee Warner La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
2d 1139, 1143 per curiam) ( ( La.
State Of Louisiana v. Aaron Wayne Bush La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State v. Alvarez 78 So. 3d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
art. 841 2 (“Defendant did not object to the introduction of the Orleans Parish Criminal District Court Docket documents on the grounds that they were not properly certified.
State v. Jacobs 67 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
h State v. McFarland, 07-26 at 9-10, 960 So.2d at 1148 ().
State of Louisiana v. Lawrence Kivin Nixon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
a case involving an aggravated burglary conviction, “In the case of a private dwelling a person must have the consent of an occupant or an occupant’s agent to constitute a defense to ‘unauthorized’ entry.” Id.
State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
(holding that although unauthorized entry for purposes of La.Rev.Stat.
State v. McFarland 960 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
the Louisiana Supreme Court observed that: [b]urglary laws are not designed primarily to protect the inhabitant from unlawful trespass and/or the intended crime, but to forestall the germination of a situation dangerous to the personal safety of the occupants.
State v. Wilson 956 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
the defendant posed as a policeman to gain entry into the victim's house.
State v. Robertson 925 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Nunnery 891 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the meaning of an unauthorized entry.
State v. Wiley 880 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
"[b]urglary laws are not designed primarily to protect the inhabitant from unlawful trespass and/or the intended crime, but to forestall the germination of a situation dangerous to the personal safety of the occupants....
State v. Rivet 798 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Ortiz, supra ; (La.
State v. Schleve 775 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Spain 757 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Smith 748 So. 2d 1139 La. 1999
"[b]urglary laws are not designed primarily to protect the inhabitant from unlawful trespass and/or the intended crime, but to forestall the germination of a situation dangerous to the personal safety of the occupants....
State v. Bush 733 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Ortiz 701 So. 2d 922 La. 1997
State v. Martin 679 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State in Interest of REB 643 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that: In the case of a private dwelling, a person must have the consent of an occupant or an occupant's agent to constitute a defense to "unauthorized" entry.
State v. Hunt 573 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Landry 557 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. McKnight 539 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Jones 537 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Johnson 522 So. 2d 1359 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
On the other hand, it was ruled that a trial court properly refused defendant’s motion for a mistrial based on an amendment of the bill of information after a *1362 burglary trial had begun, where such amendment corrected a good faith error as to the number of the apartment in which the burglary occurred and defendant failed t
State v. Harris 510 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Tuggle 504 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
(La.1979), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: In the case of a private dwelling a person must have the consent of an occupant or an occupant's agent to constitute a defense to "unauthorized" entry.
State v. Lambert 475 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Holmes 451 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
as follows: Burglary laws are not designed primarily to protect the inhabitant from unlawful trespass and/or the intended crime, but to forestall the germination of a situation dangerous to the personal safety of the occupants.
State v. Jackson 439 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Lockhart 438 So. 2d 1089 La. 1983
Lockhart did not gain entry by misrepresenting who he was.
State v. Douglas 389 So. 2d 1263 La. 1980