Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Austin, 374 So. 2d 1252.

14 citing documents.

State v. Davis 273 So. 3d 670 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
In re Milkovich , supra , citing State v. Austin , (La.
Long v. Hutchins 926 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Richey v. Richey, supra ; Robards v. Robards, 01-1100 (La.App.
Richey v. Richey 733 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
[1] W. LeFave & A. Scott, Criminal Law § 7 (1972); R. Perkins, Criminal Law 532 (1969).
State ex rel. R.J.S. 493 So. 2d 1199 La. 1986
7 W. LeFave & A. Scott, Criminal Law § 7 (1972); R. Perkins, Criminal Law 532 (1969).
In Re Milkovich 493 So. 2d 1186 La. 1986
[1] State v. Austin, *1189 W. LeFave & A. Scott, Criminal Law § 7 (1972); R. Perkins, Criminal Law 532 (1969).
State, in Interest of Rjs 493 So. 2d 1199 La. 1986
[7] W. LeFave & A. Scott, Criminal Law § 7 (1972); R. Perkins, Criminal Law 532 (1969).
State v. Broussard 474 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
1531 , 16 L.Ed.2d 622 (1966)
Legrand v. Legrand 455 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
State v. Hope 449 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Fontana v. Fontana 426 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
On April 29 (prior to the transfer of criminal jurisdiction to the Courts of Appeal) this court denied his application, ruling that the sentence was punishment, criminal in nature, and that this court had no jurisdiction, (La.
State v. Moran 400 So. 2d 1359 La. 1981
State v. Ashy 399 So. 2d 211 La. 1981
Bell v. Bell 386 So. 2d 1096 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
jurisdiction to review is depen-dant upon whether the trial court in the instant proceeding imposed a civil or criminal sanction at the contempt hearing.” the Supreme Court was faced with the issue of whether a contempt judgment in a civil proceeding for non-payment of child support involved the imposition of a criminal sanction.
Dove v. Dove 386 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
albeit under a different factual context.