Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Holden, 375 So. 2d 1372.
- State v. Jones 404 So. 2d 1192 La. 1981
-
State v. Woods
402 So. 2d 680
La. 1981
315 , (1972); he should have been informed by the trial judge of his right to a jury trial, his confrontation rights and his privilege against self incrimination, before his guilty plea was accepted.
- State v. Cusher 400 So. 2d 601 La. 1981
-
State v. Nicholas
397 So. 2d 1308
La. 1981
"Our recent decisions in State v. Lewis, supra, relative to the use of prior convictions to enhance subsequent penalties, were not intended to change the *1318 rules of law applicable to impeachment nor to shift any burden of proof in such situations to the state."
-
State v. Williams
392 So. 2d 448
La. 1980
State v. Lewis, supra; (La.
- State v. Sharp 390 So. 2d 1288 La. 1980
-
State v. Virgil
390 So. 2d 520
La. 1980
Nor are we required to hold that the United States Supreme Court’s interpretation of a federal statute involving a unique legislative history is controlling in this jurisdiction, even though the statute is similar to Louisiana’ (Dixon, J., dissenting).
-
State v. Vincent
387 So. 2d 1097
La. 1980
(2) we held that as to convictions prior to December 8, 1971, the state is required only to prove the convictions were by pleas of guilty with representation by counsel.
- State v. Jackson 389 So. 2d 69 La. 1980
-
State v. Langendorfer
389 So. 2d 1271
La. 1980
This court granted the State's writ and ordered a new sentencing
-
State v. Jefferson
386 So. 2d 77
La. 1980
this Court has now firmly established that for all pleas taken in Louisiana prior to December 8, 1971, the date of finality of State ex rel.
-
State v. Williams
384 So. 2d 779
La. 1980
Moreover, we stated that the effect of Boykin was to constitutionalize the requirements of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 as set forth in McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 , 89 S.Ct.
- State v. Martin 382 So. 2d 933 La. 1980
-
State v. Martin
379 So. 2d 1092
La. 1980
a conviction by a guilty plea taken before December 8, 1971
-
State ex rel. Mercandel v. Blackburn
380 So. 2d 1214
La. 1980
Trial court ruling is correct, is not retroactive
-
State v. Jefferson
379 So. 2d 1389
La. 1980
*1392 the State sought to use a federal conviction to enhance the sentence under LSA-R.S.
-
State v. Nelson
379 So. 2d 1072
La. 1980
as to convictions based on guilty pleas in Louisiana courts subsequent to December 8, 1971; however, we added one element to the Lewis scheme relating to the state's burden of proof to show that the conviction being used to enhance the sentence was the
- Explained State v. Bolton 379 So. 2d 722 La. 1979
-
State v. Roland
379 So. 2d 721
La. 1979
Our recent decisions in State v. Lewis, supra , relative to the use of prior convictions to enhance subsequent penalties, were not intended to change the rules of law applicable to impeachment nor to shift any burden of proof in such situations to the state.
- State v. Langendorfer 376 So. 2d 322 La. 1979