Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Holden, 375 So. 2d 1372.

70 citing documents.

  • State v. Jones 404 So. 2d 1192 La. 1981
  • State v. Woods 402 So. 2d 680 La. 1981
    315 , (1972); he should have been informed by the trial judge of his right to a jury trial, his confrontation rights and his privilege against self incrimination, before his guilty plea was accepted.
  • State v. Cusher 400 So. 2d 601 La. 1981
  • State v. Nicholas 397 So. 2d 1308 La. 1981
    "Our recent decisions in State v. Lewis, supra, relative to the use of prior convictions to enhance subsequent penalties, were not intended to change the *1318 rules of law applicable to impeachment nor to shift any burden of proof in such situations to the state."
  • State v. Williams 392 So. 2d 448 La. 1980
    State v. Lewis, supra; (La.
  • State v. Sharp 390 So. 2d 1288 La. 1980
  • State v. Virgil 390 So. 2d 520 La. 1980
    Nor are we required to hold that the United States Supreme Court’s interpretation of a federal statute involving a unique legislative history is controlling in this jurisdiction, even though the statute is similar to Louisiana’ (Dixon, J., dissenting).
  • State v. Vincent 387 So. 2d 1097 La. 1980
    (2) we held that as to convictions prior to December 8, 1971, the state is required only to prove the convictions were by pleas of guilty with representation by counsel.
  • State v. Jackson 389 So. 2d 69 La. 1980
  • State v. Langendorfer 389 So. 2d 1271 La. 1980
    This court granted the State's writ and ordered a new sentencing
  • State v. Jefferson 386 So. 2d 77 La. 1980
    this Court has now firmly established that for all pleas taken in Louisiana prior to December 8, 1971, the date of finality of State ex rel.
  • State v. Williams 384 So. 2d 779 La. 1980
    Moreover, we stated that the effect of Boykin was to constitutionalize the requirements of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 as set forth in McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 , 89 S.Ct.
  • State v. Martin 382 So. 2d 933 La. 1980
  • State v. Martin 379 So. 2d 1092 La. 1980
    a conviction by a guilty plea taken before December 8, 1971
  • State ex rel. Mercandel v. Blackburn 380 So. 2d 1214 La. 1980
    Trial court ruling is correct, is not retroactive
  • State v. Jefferson 379 So. 2d 1389 La. 1980
    *1392 the State sought to use a federal conviction to enhance the sentence under LSA-R.S.
  • State v. Nelson 379 So. 2d 1072 La. 1980
    as to convictions based on guilty pleas in Louisiana courts subsequent to December 8, 1971; however, we added one element to the Lewis scheme relating to the state's burden of proof to show that the conviction being used to enhance the sentence was the
  • Explained State v. Bolton 379 So. 2d 722 La. 1979
  • State v. Roland 379 So. 2d 721 La. 1979
    Our recent decisions in State v. Lewis, supra , relative to the use of prior convictions to enhance subsequent penalties, were not intended to change the rules of law applicable to impeachment nor to shift any burden of proof in such situations to the state.
  • State v. Langendorfer 376 So. 2d 322 La. 1979