Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Manning, 380 So. 2d 46.

41 citing documents.

State v. Cooper 223 So. 3d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Augustine 133 So. 3d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Montejo 974 So. 2d 1238 La. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Jody" Duplichan, Jr. " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Duplichan 945 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Taylor 838 So. 2d 729 La. 2003
State v. Hampton 750 So. 2d 867 La. 1999
State v. Wesley 691 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
the Louisiana Supreme Court also noted that the police may ask questions in order to “ascertain whether the defendant’s true intention is to exercise his right to silence and right to counsel.
State v. Bolden 680 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Clay 623 So. 2d 211 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Morvant, supra; State v. Jackson, supra
State v. Corley 617 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State, in Interest of Wells 532 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Green 505 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
” This assignment lacks merit.
State v. Brooks 505 So. 2d 714 La. 1987
State v. Campbell 461 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Williams 461 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
State v. Mathieu 449 So. 2d 1087 La. 1984
State v. Foley 448 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
State v. Brown 445 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
State v. Green 443 So. 2d 531 La. 1983
State v. Woods 435 So. 2d 1137 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Kohler 434 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Harper 430 So. 2d 627 La. 1983
State v. Smith 430 So. 2d 31 La. 1983
State v. Brogdon 426 So. 2d 158 La. 1983
State v. Shea 421 So. 2d 200 La. 1982
Although it has been recognized that an accused may later change his mind and waive the same rights which he earlier asserted, [ ] once a defendant has invoked his constitutional right to remain silent or his right to counsel, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the `scrupulous honoring' of that right by the police, Michigan v. Mosely, 423 U.S. 96 , 96 S.Ct.
State v. Jackson 414 So. 2d 310 La. 1982
State v. Edwards, supra ; State v. Kersey, supra
State v. Thibodeaux 414 So. 2d 366 La. 1982
State v. Fuller 414 So. 2d 306 La. 1982
State v. Stephenson 412 So. 2d 553 La. 1982
State v. Arnaud 412 So. 2d 1013 La. 1982
State v. Batiste 410 So. 2d 1055 La. 1982
State v. Davis 407 So. 2d 666 La. 1981
Although it has been recognized that an accused may later change his mind and waive the same rights which he earlier asserted [ ], once a defendant has invoked his constitutional right to remain silent or his right to counsel, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the "scrupulous honoring" of that right by the police.
State v. Petterway 403 So. 2d 1157 La. 1981
State v. Thucos 390 So. 2d 1281 La. 1980
Although it has been recognized that an accused may later change his mind and waive the same rights which he earlier asserted, [ ] once a defendant has invoked his constitutional right to remain silent or his right to counsel, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the "scrupulous honoring" of that right by the police.
State v. Landry 388 So. 2d 699 La. 1980
*702 In addition, although this court has noted that the late disclosure, as well as the nondisclosure, of exculpatory evidence can so prejudice a defendant that he is deprived of his constitutional right to a fair trial ( State v. Roussel, supra; ), there was no such deprivation in the instant case.
State v. Napier 385 So. 2d 776 La. 1980
State v. Morvant 384 So. 2d 765 La. 1980
State v. Singleton 381 So. 2d 828 La. 1980
321 , 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975); do not find a refusal to sign a written waiver form of itself tantamount to such request.
State v. Roussel 381 So. 2d 796 La. 1980
United States v. Kaplan, 554 F.2d 577 (3 Cir. 1977), United States v. Miller, 529 F.2d 1125 (9 Cir. 1976).
State v. Manning 380 So. 2d 54 La. 1980
handed down this day January 24, 1980, and the reasons for holding the confessions in that case admissible are equally applicable to the statements at issue here.